Previously cropr wrote: > I don't use FormEncode. It is based on a very common design mistake > made by a lot of programmers, who think one can better generate html > from code. When a graphical artist designs the layout of a web page, > he uses tools who speak html, css and javascript, but no python (or > Perl, Java, C++, ...).
While I agree FormEncode is very far from ideal, your argument does not make sense to me. FormEncode does not generate markup at all unless you explicitly tell it to. I do exactly what you describe: hand-written markup written by a designer, with FormEncode on the backend only doing decoding and validation. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---