On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 1:57 PM, ED209 <edleades...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the replys. The only issues I can think of are: > > # Create a 404 type page for anyone going to a non-existing /:username > # validate choice of /:username against routes > # validation should also check an array of banned/legacy/reserved > routes > # if a user creates a :username which I later want as a static route - > tough! I'll have to think of another name > > Apart from that I can't see any technical or performance issues?
No, it's just a regular routing variable. You may want to set a requirement to allow only word characters to prevent people from using offbeat symbols. -- Mike Orr <sluggos...@gmail.com> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
