Yes, it is much closer to your pyramid_openapi3 demos.  I'm not sure that 
project is a good candidate for my requirements or bandwidth, but I will 
dig into it - thanks!




On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 4:52:45 PM UTC-5 Steve Piercy wrote:

> My first thought was to use docstrings and Sphinx, but I don't think 
> that's what you want.
>
> It sounds like you want to document an API, something like 
> pyramid_openapi3.
>
> https://github.com/Pylons/pyramid_openapi3/
>
> RealWorld.io app API Demo (it might take a while to start up the app, as 
> it is on-demand only).
>
> https://pyramid-realworld.herokuapp.com/api
>
> --steve
>
>
> On 3/12/21 1:36 PM, 'Jonathan Vanasco' via pylons-discuss wrote:
> > I had a small Pyramid project which has grown into a much larger one.
> > 
> > Many Views service multiple Routes (multiple calls to `@view_config()`), 
> typically offering a default HTML version on a "bare" url, and a JSON 
> version with a ".json" suffix to the url.
> > 
> > Documenting these routes has become increasingly burdensome, and I 
> really need to simplify it.  For clarity, the docs are served by the 
> application itself and in a structured format.
> > 
> > Right now I have two types of documentation, and I'd like to consolidate 
> it into a single one.
> > 
> > * The original documentation was built off a Python file, 
> `/lib/docs.py`, which just notes the routes which have JSON endpoints, 
> gives an "about" docstring, and offers a dict about how the route functions 
> (GET vs POST, is it self-documenting, etc).
> > 
> > * As the project progressed, the routes started self-documenting.  Forms 
> were moved to POST only, with GET offering structured details 
> (instructions, required vs optional form elements, etc). Most of this is 
> defined by just returning a dict on GET operations.
> > 
> > I've been trying to figure out the best ways to consolidate this. 
> Perhaps using a custom decorator to declare and track this information into 
> a namespace?
> > 
> > Has anyone else worked on a scenario like this?  How did you handle it?
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "pylons-discuss" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to pylons-discus...@googlegroups.com <mailto:
> pylons-discus...@googlegroups.com>.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pylons-discuss/2cc3c09f-037a-4cf0-9a18-b464540a2305n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pylons-discuss/2cc3c09f-037a-4cf0-9a18-b464540a2305n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
> >.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pylons-discuss/b2946103-6911-48d7-b352-b75911b96d9dn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to