Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
I assumed we would have a separate thread for the core vote, but what
the heck. :)
+1 is my core vote.
+1 from me as well.
When the core group votes for a release candidate, is it a consensus
vote or a majority vote? To quote from the Apache voting guidelines, "An
action item requiring consensus approval must receive at least 3 binding
+1 votes and no vetos. An action item requiring majority approval must
receive at least 3 binding +1 votes and more +1 votes than -1 votes
(i.e., a majority with a minimum quorum of three positive votes)".
My interpretation of the rest of guideline is that a consensus vote is
only required for actual code changes. Perhaps we should set our own
policy for a vote on a release candidate?
See http://httpd.apache.org/dev/guidelines.html.
If this is a majority vote, then the polls are closed and 3.2.7 is the
winner. :) (And I didn't even use a calulator this time. ;) )
Jim
