On 9/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Steven> print 'foo:', foo, 'bar:', bar, 'baz:', baz,
> Steven> print 'frobble', frobble
>
> Steven> In my proposed function:
>
> Steven> print('foo:', foo, 'bar:', bar, 'baz:', baz,
> Steven> 'frobble', frobble)
>
> Steven> To my (admittedly biased) eyes, the second version more
> Steven> obviously prints to a single line.
>
> Yes, you're right. My bad.
>
> So, is the proposal that you would need an explicit "\n" to terminate the
> output or not?
Well, my proposal (which differs from Guidos) is that the print
function (or whatever it ends up getting called) would have the
semantics:
def print(*args):
sys.stdout.write(' '.join(str(arg) for arg in args))
sys.stdout.write('\n')
STeVe
--
You can wordify anything if you just verb it.
--- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
