Brett Cannon wrote: > I am fine with changing the built-in types, but changing the built-in > singletons just looks *really* odd to me. So odd that I just don't > want to see them changed. I mean when I think of constants, I think > of a variable that references an object and that reference never > changes. The built-ins you are referencing, though, are singletons: > named objects that are not variables. So keeping their naming scheme > as-is does not feel like a breaking of the rules to me since they are > not treated the same (especially at the C level).
Actually, I thought some of them would become reserved words in P3k, anyway. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com