On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:13:24 +0100, Georg Brandl <g.bra...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Am 31.01.2010 13:03, schrieb Simon Cross:
> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu> 
> > wrote:
> >> I'd be a big +1 to using a single ".pyr" directory per source directory.
> > 
> > I don't know whether I in favour of using a single pyr folder or not
> > but if a single folder is used I'd definitely prefer the folder to be
> > called __pyr__ rather than .pyr.
> 
> And to come complete with standard library functions to find the corresponding
> .py for a .pyc and .pyc for a .py.

+1

--
R. David Murray                                      www.bitdance.com
Business Process Automation - Network/Server Management - Routers/Firewalls
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to