On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:13:24 +0100, Georg Brandl <g.bra...@gmx.net> wrote: > Am 31.01.2010 13:03, schrieb Simon Cross: > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu> > > wrote: > >> I'd be a big +1 to using a single ".pyr" directory per source directory. > > > > I don't know whether I in favour of using a single pyr folder or not > > but if a single folder is used I'd definitely prefer the folder to be > > called __pyr__ rather than .pyr. > > And to come complete with standard library functions to find the corresponding > .py for a .pyc and .pyc for a .py.
+1 -- R. David Murray www.bitdance.com Business Process Automation - Network/Server Management - Routers/Firewalls _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com