Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> writes: > Would you still be a -1 on making it the new scheme the default if it > used a single cache directory instead? That would actually be cleaner > than the current solution rather than messier.
+0 on a default of “store compiled bytecode files in a single cache directory”. It is indeed cleaner than the current default. I'm only +0 because I don't know whether that actually addresses the use case that raised the issue to begin with, so I'm postponing judgement until those who want this change in the first place chime in. -- \ “Once consumers can no longer get free music, they will have to | `\ buy the music in the formats we choose to put out.” —Steve | _o__) Heckler, VP of Sony Music, 2001 | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
