Am 27.09.2010 22:17, schrieb P.J. Eby: > At 12:36 PM 9/27/2010 -0700, Brett Cannon wrote: >> All fixed. > > Nope.
Indeed. The immediate problem was that genpepindex tried to read pep-0000, and didn't like it. I worked around that in r85041, so that genpepindex now skips over pep-0000.txt. However, if it's really important that the fields in a PEP are in a certain order (why is that important?), then I guess PEP 0 should really comply with its own specification :-) Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
