Am 08/03/2016 05:31 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested.
The files to be used in testing are at
<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-patch1/binaries/Windows>.
The files to be tested and reviewed are
* README-4.1.2-patch1-apply-Windows.txt
The description of the procedure for applying a corrected
library file to installed copies of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2
on Windows. Read this first before deciding to download
the Zip file and attempting the procedure.
wow, really? I think I need much more time for this than an average
evening. ;-) I'll do the README steps on Sunday.
* apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1-apply-Win_x86.zip
The Zip archive containing the files to be used in the
procedure. There is a copy of the README within the
archive as well.
- I've exchanged the DLL
- Created a new text and presentation document with simple content.
- Both were reopened successfully.
Anything more to test?
* apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1-apply-Win_x86.zip.asc
I don't know if this is OK or still bad:
gpg --verify apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1-apply-Win_x86.zip.asc
apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1-apply-Win_x86.zip
gpg: Signature made Tue 02 Aug 2016 06:24:08 AM CEST using RSA key ID
D456628A
gpg: Good signature from "keybase.io/orcmid (confirmed identifier)
<orc...@keybase.io>"
gpg: aka "orcmid (Dennis E. Hamilton) <orc...@msn.com>"
gpg: aka "orcmid Apache (code signing) <orc...@apache.org>"
gpg: aka "Dennis E. Hamilton (orcmid)
<dennis.hamil...@acm.org>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.
* apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1-apply-Win_x86.zip.md5
Windows 10 Home (Version 1511):
I've visually compared the MD5 hashes from the ZIP and MD5 file
--> OK
Linux:
$ md5sum -c apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1.zip.md5
--> OK
* apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1-apply-Win_x86.zip.sha256
Windows 10 Home (Version 1511):
I've visually compared the SHA256 hashes from the ZIP and SHA256 file
--> OK
Linux:
$ sha256sum -c apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1.zip.sha256
--> OK
REQUESTED TESTING
* [OPTIONAL] If you are able to check any of the .asc,
.md5, and .sha256 files against the .zip, report any
difficulties that may have been encountered.
Please remove the new line at the end of the MD5 file. Otherwise it
doesn't work on Linux:
md5sum -c apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1-apply-Win_x86.zip.md5
: No such file or directory.1.2-patch1-apply-Win_x86.zip
: FAILED open or read.2-patch1-apply-Win_x86.zip
md5sum: WARNING: 1 of 1 listed file could not be read
* If you performed the procedure, report
* the version of Microsoft Windows and the type of
account used (administrator or standard user).
Windows 10 Home (Version 1511)
Administrator
* report whether the procedure succeeded
Yes
* if the procedure failed or met with difficulties,
please summarize the problems and how you over-
came any of them
To do a quick check, I've used a shortcut:
I've used the Total Commander (started as administrator, a normal user
cannot modify anything in the OpenOffice directory) and exchanged the DLL.
* [IMPORTANT] Identify any missing, incomplete or
confusing information in the README. Describe what you
see as important improvements before making general
release of the procedure for use by non-expert users of
Apache OpenOffice on Windows.
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
