Marcus wrote: > Am 08/19/2016 01:09 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] >>> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 14:46 >>> To: qa@openoffice.apache.org; d...@openoffice.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows >>> >> [ ... ] >>> [knmc] >>> As we move forward to a general distribution here is an odt >>> revision of >>> the readme that can be used to generate an html, pdf, or text versions. >>> All versions are attached but may not come through to the list. They >>> can >>> all be accessed from the following link. >>> <https://1drv.ms/f/s!AMMYmStvrJNJgQQ> >>> All feedback is both welcomed and encouraged. >> [orcmid] >> >> The .odt and the .txt file come through as attachments. >> >> Do you have specific recommendations about what should be done with >> these? >> >> I notice that there are problems with the .txt file layout not having >> hard line breaks. The name changes and dates in 0.2.0 are not >> reflected. The .odt also needs layout work. There's too much white >> space and I have not looked closely enough to figure out why. >> >> I know we differ on formatting and some document organization >> matters. I am not going to address them at this point. >> >> I am going to 1.0.0 now, essentially with the 0.2.0 except for the >> change of version number and removal of the limitation to testing >> use. I did the other repair you suggested. I think Marcus is ready >> on the other binaries, so something will happen tomorrow (Friday). >> >> I'm not certain what the final inch is just yet, but it looks like >> everything is ready enough. > > I haven't read the updates from Keith yet. But when they have no real > news and are just formulation and layout updates, then I suggest to > let us go live with text and binaries we have now. > [knmc] I am fully in agreement with the above Marcus. As I said in my reply to Dennis, it took me longer than I had originally anticipated to get the structure. > We can think about to update them after that with no hurry anymore. > The announcement about the source patch was ~1 month ago. We shouldn't > wait any longer with the binary patches. > > Sorry Keith. ;-) > No need to apologize I fully agree.
Regards Keith > Marcus > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
