On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 5:12 PM Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 4:28 PM Cindy Lu <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 3:54 PM Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 2:03 PM Cindy Lu <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:05 AM Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Cindy:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:29 AM Cindy Lu <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > we need a crash in Non-standard image, here is the jira for this
> > > > > > https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-28522
> > > > > > The root cause of the issue is that an IRQFD was used without
> > > > > > initialization..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > During the booting process of the Vyatta image, the behavior of the
> > > > > > called function in qemu is as follows:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. vhost_net_stop() was called, this will call the function
> > > > > > virtio_pci_set_guest_notifiers() with assgin= false, and
> > > > > > virtio_pci_set_guest_notifiers(） will release the irqfd for vector 0
> > > > >
> > > > > Before vhost_net_stop(), do we know which vector is used by which
> > > > > queue?
> > > > >
> > > > before this stop, vdev->config_verctor is get from
> > > > virtio_pci_common_read/virtio_pci_common_write
> > > > it was set to vector 0
> > >
> > > I basically meant if vector 0 is shared with some virtqueues here.
> > >
> > Really sorry for this, vq's vector is 1,2, and will not share with the
> > configure vector
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2. virtio_reset() was called -->set configure vector to
> > > > > > VIRTIO_NO_VECTORt
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 3.vhost_net_start() was called (at this time the configure vector is
> > > > > > still VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR) and call virtio_pci_set_guest_notifiers()
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > assgin= true, so the irqfd for vector 0 was not "init" during this
> > > > > > process
> > > > >
> > > > > How does the configure vector differ from the virtqueue vector here?
> > > > >
> > > > All the vectors are VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR (including vq). any
> > > > msix_fire_vector_notifier()
> > > > been called will cause the crash at this time.
> > >
> > > Won't virtio_pci_set_guest_notifiers() will try to allocate irqfd when
> > > the assignment is true?
> > >
> > It will allocate, but the vector is VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR (0xffff)
> >
> > then it will called kvm_virtio_pci_vector_use_one()
> >
> > in this function, there is a check for
> >
> > if (vector >= msix_nr_vectors_allocated(dev))
> >
> > { return 0; }
> >
> > So it will return.
>
> How about let's just fix this?
>
> Btw, it's better to explain in detail like the above in the next version.
>
> Thanks
>
The problem is I think the behavior here is correct, The vector here is
VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR and we should return,
the fix could work maybe is we try get to know if this was changed
from another value
and use that one? this seems strange.
Thanks
cindy
> >
> > > > So I think this should
> > > > be a bug in this guest image
> > >
> > > The point is Qemu should not crash even if the guest driver is buggy.
> > >
> > > It would be nice if we can have a qtest for this on top.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > sure, got it, I have done the Qtest, and it passed
> > here is the result
> >
> > Ok: 794
> > Expected Fail: 0
> > Fail: 0
> > Unexpected Pass: 0
> > Skipped: 32
> > Timeout: 0
> >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 4. The system continues to boot and msix_fire_vector_notifier() was
> > > > > > called unmask the vector 0 and then met the crash
> > > > > > [msix_fire_vector_notifier] 112 called vector 0 is_masked 1
> > > > > > [msix_fire_vector_notifier] 112 called vector 0 is_masked 0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The reason for not reproducing in RHEL/fedora guest image is because
> > > > > > REHL/Fedora doesn't have the behavior of calling vhost_net_stop and
> > > > > > then virtio_reset, and also won't call msix_fire_vector_notifier
> > > > > > for vector 0 during system boot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The reason for not reproducing before configure interrupt support
> > > > > > is because
> > > > > > vector 0 is for configure interrupt, before the support for
> > > > > > configure interrupts, the notifier process will not handle vector 0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For the device Vyatta using, it doesn't support configure
> > > > > > interrupts at all, So we plan to disable the configure interrupts
> > > > > > in unsupported device
> > > > >
> > > > > Btw, let's tweak the changelog, it's a little bit hard to understand.
> > > > >
> > > > sure will do
> > > > thanks
> > > > Cindy
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <l...@redhat.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cindy Lu (2):
> > > > > > virtio-net: disable the configure interrupt for not support device
> > > > > > virtio-pci: check if the configure interrupt enable
> > > > > >
> > > > > > hw/net/virtio-net.c | 5 ++++-
> > > > > > hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 41
> > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > > > > hw/virtio/virtio.c | 1 +
> > > > > > include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 1 +
> > > > > > 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.43.0
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
