On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 12:50, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 12:05, Cindy Lu <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 6:01 PM Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > > wrote: > > > Hi; Coverity points out what it thinks is a problem in > > > this commit (CID 1543938):
> > > Here we pass that through to kvm_virtio_pci_vector_use_one(). > > > In kvm_virtio_pci_vector_use_one()'s error-exit path ("undo") > > > it does > > > vector = virtio_queue_vector(vdev, queue_no); > > > and in virtio_queue_vector() it does: > > > > > > return n < VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX ? vdev->vq[n].vector : > > > VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR; > > > > > > where 'n' is an int, so if we can get here with queue_no being > > > VIRTIO_CONFIG_IRQ_IDX then we'll index off the front of the > > > vdev->vq[] array. > > > > > > Maybe this is a "can't happen" case, but it does seem odd that > > > virtio_queue_vector() only bounds-checks the "too big" case > > > for its argument and not the "too small" case and/or it > > > doesn't have a special case for VIRTIO_CONFIG_IRQ_IDX. > > > > > > > + } > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > > hi peter > > I think we can simply remove the part > > vector = virtio_queue_vector(vdev, queue_no); > > the vector is get from virtio_pci_get_notifier() and don't need to get it > > again > > I will send the fix soon > > The error handling in kvm_virtio_pci_vector_use_one() looks > a bit odd in other ways, too. The only bit of "undoing" > it does as far as I can see is calling kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(), > but there is no code path that gets to there where the > main codepath's call to kvm_virtio-pci_irqfd_use() succeeded > and needs to be undone. So perhaps the entire "undo" code > block should be deleted, and the "goto undo" lines > replaced by simple "return ret;" ? (The codepath > for "kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_use() failed" already does the > "kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_release()" by hand there.) In any case since the error handling in kvm_virtio_pci_vector_use_one() isn't new in this commit (you can get the same problem via kvm_virtio_pci_vector_config_use(), which is CID 1468940 first detected in 2022), I think this is not something we need to rush to fix before we release 9.0. If anybody disagrees now would be a good time to say so :-) Paolo's comment on CID 1468940 was to suggest "virtio_queue_vector should check VIRTIO_CONFIG_IRQ_IDX just like virtio_pci_get_notifier", incidentally. thanks -- PMM