----- Original Message ----- From: "gwicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 8:13 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tony Firshman" > Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:36 PM > Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership > > > > On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 at 16:59:33, Mike MacNamara wrote: > > (ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > > > >>Hmm..... > >> > >>Quanta Membership Sec did not respond to my requests to renew, has lapsed > >>for a few years now. Never got any response. > > I hope that whoever on the Quanta committee reads this (John G and Geoff > > for two!) will make sure the membership secretary is getting emails. > > > > I had similar problems. > > > > It seems the re-direction may be dodgy. > > > > This is strange because I did a test on what I thought might be an obsolete > email address about a month ago and there were no problems. If there is a > problem I suggest it is a dodgy rather than a non-existent redirection. > > Can I suggest that if you do report a contact problem, you always mention > the email address you used. The best one is > > membership @ quanta.org.uk > > Best Wishes, > Geoff > > Apart from the address that Geoff recommends above, I am still receiving on [EMAIL PROTECTED] but if you want to be absolutely sure, use [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] The problem is that if emails go astray, the intended recipient is not aware that they were ever sent in the first place so doesn't report it. I have had one request for membership today and already responded with full details. Lapsed membership? Surely we can put that right. John Gilpin, Quanta Membership Secretary. _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm
