On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:48:43 +0100, Marcel Kilgus wrote
> P Witte wrote:
> > If its so much bother implementing SMSQ/E on a faster (but different)
> > processor, isnt it worthwhile revisiting the multi-processor option again?
> > If you cant get faster processors, use more of them!
>
> Well, that's only worthwhile if you have work that can be done in
> parallel. For 99% of all SMSQ/E installations I guess this is not the
> case.
I am not a programmer but I often wondered why at least some SMSQ/E
applications are not made of one or more "data" things with a lot of
executable things gravitating around the data. With the idea of
multiprocessing in mind. And the possibility of swapping some of those
executable things with other better or different ones. Mais bon, bref...
Arnould
WebMail / Magic OnLine
http://www.magic.fr
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
