>>Quanta has noted both the quality of the site and its great >>features. >>Congratulations. > My main problem with the Quanta site is that every time I have > looked on > it, mainly for future events I think, it has been out of date, often > by > over a year. > > I have simply given up looking there now, so it may be OK now (8-)# > > I don't think we need 'great features' to make the Quanta site OK. > > Tony Like most websites, when it comes to Quanta I guess we are looking more for content and regular updating than technical brilliance. Which is where so many 'professional' sites go wrong, at least hobbyists can cite lack of time.
It could be said that technical brilliance is the last thing a QL site needs anyway - we go on the QL sites to get at the content and information, not to wait minutes for some flashy animation to download. At least you can quickly get onto Tony Firshman's site and hear him speak in no time at all! I can "sort of" read many QL-related sites via the mono screen on my mobile phone (OK, I was a bit bored at the time!). If we are to use something like Lynx to browse on a QL system sites need to be kept to fairly simple html anyway. In my own case, I gave up on my site's 'news' page because I couldn't find time to keep it up to date. It's hard enough ensuring that something like my 'QL Shows' page gets kept reasonably up to date! -- Dilwyn Jones -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.21/236 - Release Date: 20/01/2006 _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
