Per Witte wrote: > In Duncan's program you could have just had > > 9476 IF dv_start <= 1 THEN NEXT i > 9478 END FOR i > > but this is bad programming practise as at some later time you might > forget that the two lines belonged together and introduce new lines > or > changes, thus unnoticed subtly altering the logic of the program and > creating a possible nightmare bug hunt for the future. > > Per I think that this was why I started using the NEXT i:EXIT i clause. I do seem to remember a nightmare bug hunt involving just this in one of my programs.
-- Dilwyn Jones _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
