Hi, Interesting project, thanks for the link. I also think that there are already useable 68k projects out and posted the link to the www.fpgaarcade.com a week ago. My knowledge about this hardware developments is too limited but I would be happy if somebody of the specialist could just post an opinion. Do we need to reinvent the wheel or can a QL FPGA project be done on excisting solutions?
cheers, Thorsten >That means to me there's actually no need to design a specific "QL >replacement hardware". You could take everything that meeds the two >requirements and has enough modernism on it to fulfill today's >expectation (Like SDHC, USB, probably Ethernet,...). Anything designed >today would (and should) definitely be far off what made out the >original QL. >Look here >http://www.experiment-s.de/en/boards/suska-iii-t/ >This is something that already exists - fulfills (nearly) all the >requirements and just lacks a decent operating system. But is not cheap. >I would expect, however, that any other development would end up in the >same price range. >It's not the hardware that is missing! >Cheers, >Tobias _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
