Hi George On Wednesday, 22 February 2012, 14:24 George Gwilt wrote: > You are quite right. But how did you get var%=-3? Does this imply another > mistake in Parser?
No, I don't think so. -3 comes from for_flag% for an earlier occurence of p Your solution looks the best - it's neater. Michael _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
