I havent tested your suggestion yet, Wolfgang, but what I found so far
was that gggbbbbbrrrrrgg0 appears (to my eye) to look cleaner than
gggbbbbbrrrrrggW. Is that so wrong? ;)
BTW, when converting the translation to assembler, I found the
following representation helpful:
GGGggRRR rrBBBbbW = mode 33
gggBBBbb RRRrrGGG = mode 32
gggBBBbb RRRrrGGW = mode 32 translated
Per
On 16/12/2017 10:55, Wolf via Ql-Users wrote:
No, not the same as %gggbbbbbrrrrrggW, as suggested in the original
post.
Wolfgang
On 16/12/2017 10:18, Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote:
Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users wrote:
I'd do it this way
%ggWbbbbbrrrrrggg
Which is the same :)
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
.
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
