In a message dated 19/03/2004 11:17:31 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Huhu, dada. Kindergarten level reached at last, and Roy pulls out the
intellectual waterpistol :-) Since the easiest way to escape that game
level is the 'unsubscribe' command, I'll just use it hereafter.

I'm well aware that I'm only a small candle in software development, not
comparable to the real free software heros like Mark Swift, Jonathan
Hudson, Richard Zidlicky and others. Nevertheless I think my offer was
necessary, although the chances it would be accepted were small from the start.

Those who think I still had free software ambitions left in Post-Tony-Tebby
SMSQ/E (and would therefore 'give a present') are as wrong as can be. As
far as I'm personally concerned Wolfgang can keep his license forever - I
simply don't care anymore.

One last remark. I've often been misinterpreted in a way that I'd want
_everything_ to become free software. This is not so, although I'd probably
never want any money for a piece of QL software that I write myself.
Having read between the lines in all this, the status of SMSQ/e and just how "free" it is, appears to be more a battle of wills between the parties concerned.  I do not see that this situation will ever be resolved, especially now that various changes/additions to SMSQ/e have already been submitted and incorporated in the code.  I wonder if all the people who contributed those changes would now agree to SMSQ/e and their code being made freely distributable under GPL, or would we have to go back several versions so that only Tony Tebby would have to agree to this (if indeed he now changed his mind to allow it)??
 
The whole situation is a mess and it is only the users who are losing out.
 
If Peter is unwilling to allow the majority of QL users have access to his code, then so be it - we will just have to accept that situation and move on.  Most people seem perfectly happy with SMSQ/e and how it is now and the way in which changes are managed and released.  Most people are ignorant of why Peter and others want SMSQ/e to be under GPL and also  what changes this would actually bring.  To tell the truth, I would bet most people simply do not care, so long as SMSQ/e continues to be developed and released for the good of the QL community.
 
Enough of the bickering.
 
If a programmer wants to release his hard work for only a small percentage of the QL community, then so be it.  It's just a shame that very few people will ever see the benefits of his work.
 
Peter, if you no longer want to subscribe to this list, then this will only push you further from the QL community and even fewer people will know what great feats you achieve.  However, it is your choice.
 
Maybe once the software is released, you will advertise it in Quanta and QL Today so that people will be aware of it, what it does and what is can be used on.  However, I doubt many people will use it (alas) as there are so few who use QDOS Classic as their operating system of choice.
 
I wonder why people do not chose QDOS Classic as their main operating system.  Could it be:
1) It has not been improved for some years (so far as I know, since it was ported to the Q40)
2) It has no pointer environment, which many people are used to, and which is used by a vast majority of current programs (IS THIS STILL TRUE)??
3) It is difficult to get running and cannot access the same files on the hard disk as SMSQ/e (if you have a dual boot system).
4) It still contains bugs left over from QDOS, and lacks many of the facilities of SMSQ/e (multitasking BASICs, faster interpreter, SERMouse drivers)
 
I stand to be corrected on these comments on QDOS Classic and I am sure that George Gwilt would love a simple step by step guide as to how to set it up, so that we can find out why QWord cannot open its TurboPTR windows under it.
 
--
Rich Mellor
RWAP Services
35 Chantry Croft, Kinsley, Pontefract, West Yorkshire, WF9 5JH
TEL: 01977 610509
Visit our website at URL:http://www.rwapsoftware.co.uk

Stuck with ordinary dial up internet connection ??
Read our review of internet accelerators and broadband at:
URL: http://www.rwapadventures.com/Services/reviews.html

Reply via email to