On 8/28/2009 12:33 PM, Kevin Wright wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Henrik Bengtsson 
<h...@stat.berkeley.edu>wrote:

Quite a while ago I put up "R Coding Conventions (RCC) - a draft", now at:

 http://docs.google.com/View?id=dddzqd53_2646dcw759cb

It's useful for beginners and those coding "randomly".  Like it or not.

It's ok to try to persuade people coding randomly, but otherwise it is
waste of time to get into arguing over if-else or bracketing - we all
have our own favorite.

/Henrik


No, it IS not a waste of time.  I have wasted considerable time due the lack
of a standard.  Yesterday I was debugging panel.levelplot and found this
code:

    if (x.is.factor) {
        ux <- sort(unique(x[!is.na(x)]))
        lx <- rep(1, length(ux))
        cx <- ux
    }
    else {
        ux <- sort(unique(x[!is.na(x)]))
        bx <- if (length(ux) > 1)
            c(3 * ux[1] - ux[2], ux[-length(ux)] + ux[-1], 3 *
                ux[length(ux)] - ux[length(ux) - 1])/2
        else ux + c(-0.5, 0.5) * minXwid
        lx <- diff(bx)
        cx <- (bx[-1] + bx[-length(bx)])/2
    }

You can't step through this because the "else" block starts on a new line.

In your other message you were talking about the browser. Does it really have a problem with this (which would be a bug), or are you basically just cutting and pasting?

So you have to manually evaluate the value of "x.is.factor" to determine if
it is TRUE or FALSE, scroll down to the line below "else" and continue
stepping through the code.  Try not to forget to accidentally evaluate the
last brace or do something else that kicks you out of the browser and forces
you to start all over again.

Now that doesn't sound like the browser. Whatever debugger you are using has a bug.

Duncan Murdoch


Forbidding the use of "else" without a leading curly bracket would have
saved me MUCH time over the years...

(Sorry Deepayan.  I love lattice.  Please forgive me.)

Kevin Wright


On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Kevin Wright<kw.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:41 AM, hadley wickham <h.wick...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>> > Perhaps most of you have already seen this?
>> >
>> >
http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/google-r-style.html
>> >
>> > Comments/Critiques?
>>
>> I made my own version that reflects my personal biases:
>> http://had.co.nz/stat405/resources/r-style-guide.html
>>
>> Hadley
>>
>>
> In the spirit of "less is more", I find the underscores to be distracting
> and unneeded typing.  Just simplify to camel caps.
>
> I echo Duncan's idea that a line should never start with "else".  Duncan
> mentioned this in the context of cutting and pasting, but the other place
> that not having "else" start a line is when using the "browser" function
and
> stepping through code line by line.
>
> Kevin
>
>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>


        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to