On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Martin Maechler wrote:

>>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>     on Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:15:09 -0500 writes:
...
> For "edits", we'd mostly like to receive feedback on the
> *source* of the above automatically produced document
> (which is also the source of the PDF version, same URL as above,
> just replace ".html" by ".pdf")
>
> The development source is always available at
>  https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/doc/manual/R-exts.texi

Would it be horrid to include the reference to the sources in the derived 
documents?  It might help with self-documenting the process and help 
demonstrate the benefits of R's open source philosophy.

> Thanking you for offering feedback,

Thank you.

Dave
-- 
  Dr. David Forrest
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                    (804)684-7900w
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                             (804)642-0662h
                                    http://maplepark.com/~drf5n/

______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to