On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>> on Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:15:09 -0500 writes:
...
> For "edits", we'd mostly like to receive feedback on the
> *source* of the above automatically produced document
> (which is also the source of the PDF version, same URL as above,
> just replace ".html" by ".pdf")
>
> The development source is always available at
> https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/doc/manual/R-exts.texi
Would it be horrid to include the reference to the sources in the derived
documents? It might help with self-documenting the process and help
demonstrate the benefits of R's open source philosophy.
> Thanking you for offering feedback,
Thank you.
Dave
--
Dr. David Forrest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (804)684-7900w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (804)642-0662h
http://maplepark.com/~drf5n/
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
