On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> on Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:15:09 -0500 writes: ... > For "edits", we'd mostly like to receive feedback on the > *source* of the above automatically produced document > (which is also the source of the PDF version, same URL as above, > just replace ".html" by ".pdf") > > The development source is always available at > https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/doc/manual/R-exts.texi
Would it be horrid to include the reference to the sources in the derived documents? It might help with self-documenting the process and help demonstrate the benefits of R's open source philosophy. > Thanking you for offering feedback, Thank you. Dave -- Dr. David Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] (804)684-7900w [EMAIL PROTECTED] (804)642-0662h http://maplepark.com/~drf5n/ ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.