It would also be nice if there were links in the .Rd files back to the source of the commands, not just the source of the documentation. That would facilitate and encourage readers to paruse the source to clarify the meaning of the help files.
On 1/16/07, David Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Martin Maechler wrote: > > >>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>> on Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:15:09 -0500 writes: > ... > > For "edits", we'd mostly like to receive feedback on the > > *source* of the above automatically produced document > > (which is also the source of the PDF version, same URL as above, > > just replace ".html" by ".pdf") > > > > The development source is always available at > > https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/doc/manual/R-exts.texi > > Would it be horrid to include the reference to the sources in the derived > documents? It might help with self-documenting the process and help > demonstrate the benefits of R's open source philosophy. > > > Thanking you for offering feedback, > > Thank you. > > Dave > -- > Dr. David Forrest > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (804)684-7900w > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (804)642-0662h > http://maplepark.com/~drf5n/ > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
