Firstly - congratulations to Matthew Butterick on beautiful design! Now to the feedback: 1. There is one thing that frustrates me most when I stumble upon new website/package/repository for the first time and I have no previous knowledge of its content. It is due to the amount of time it takes me to get an answer to a simple question: "What am I looking at?". If I can get the answer quicker using google search or wikipedia than the website itself is probably missing something. With current design I get the answer as to what it includes (eg. batteries, it can run cross-platform) before I can conclude that Racket is probably a programming language (and some more cool stuff) although this is never stated just inferred. Calling Racket a programming language maybe sells it short but at least gives the answer to the question "What am I looking at". Placing something like the old "Programming-language Programming Language" somewhere near the top may solve the issue. 2. Greyed out code snippets - I am not a fan of too much greyed out text or code. It causes unnecessary eye strain. If this has to stay maybe make it not AS GREY as it is right now. 3. I understand other pages like documentation (or rather its out of place top black Racket bar) and Packages will also have a look overhaul. If that's the case than one word: great! Especially that the old Packages (pkgs...) looks now terribly outdated 4. [NON-DESIGN] Racket Manifesto link (under "The Best of Scheme/Lisp) gives 404 error page. I think these most important documents should be placed on Racket server to avoid this in the future.
These are just my personal views - feel free to adapt/ignore. Greg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.