> But I was really expecting that the option -t in the racket command should > replace the explicit (require…) in B.rkt. Something like > >> racket -t A.rkt -f B.rkt > default-load-handler: expected a `module' declaration, but found something > else
Yes that almost works, but A.rkt needs to provide things for the require to get them. Also, I guess we need --lib racket (maybe my -I racket was a mistake): > racket --lib racket -t A.rkt -f B.rkt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAFUu9R6XQ_4wF%3DOFvA1SKsSLFf90wcg0rhUTyTuPVZKf-cDShg%40mail.gmail.com.
