After reading chapter 2 (again) it seems that the copyright date is used
when the publication date is absent.  However, when I look at OCLC
*682881065, I see [2010], c2010.  The publication date is nowhere in the
book (the preface is signed 2010).  So why not, according to RDA, only use
the copyright date?

-- 
Gene Fieg
Cataloger/Serials Librarian
Claremont School of Theology
gf...@cst.edu

Reply via email to