Rochard Baumgarten asked:
>I am listing all four editors. All of them have some of their
>writings in the book. I am not creating a Contents note because of
>the sheer size that it would be. Should I just use the relationship
>designator of editor or use both author and editor?
We would not use $eauthor ore $faut. They are not not authors of the
work, only of parts of it, so are contributors not authors.
Confusion of joint authors of a work with contributors of parts of a
compilation, will be a major RDA record mistake I suspect.
Another reason for not using $eauthor or $4aut, is that one would then
expect the first 700 to be a 100. If something in addition to $editor
or $4edt is wanted, use $econtributor or $4ctb.
There is nothing wrong with repeating $e or $4. No $2 with source
code is needed.
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
