|
In a message dated 8/2/2005 10:02:43 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They claim that they only want the "evidence against evolution" taught, but this is primarily a tactical maneuver. Their stated goal remains not only equal time, but the replacement of evolution with ID, as their own documents clearly shows. I am perplexed by this response to those critical of evolutionary theories,
acting as though there is some dark cabal in it all.
Scientific theory invites inquisition of explanatory statements: this
because that. If ID has no purpose other than reminding folks that
evolutionary "theories" are able to be disproved, and to remove the talismanic
veil of reverence that evolutionists have conjured around the theories, allowing
open, scientific, critical analysis, then this is a good development for
science.
Jim Henderson
Senior Counsel
ACLJ
|
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
