Dr. Ball, Esq.:

The title game is tricky. I taught at a school where many faculty did not have Ph..D.'s, leftover from an age when people with an MA could get tenure, and everyone called himself/herself "professor." I quickly learned that "Dr." carried great weight. At another place, where I studied, all faculty were called Mr. or Ms., not professor or doctor. Then of course there was "Dr." Kissinger. I have found when I am outside the university "Dr." carries a great deal more status than "professor." In the end, what matters it what you do with your position and degree, not what you call yourself or someone else calls you. Most law professors of course are not "Dr.," despite the JD degree.

Paul (Call me Paul) Finkelman, Ph.D.

--
Paul Finkelman
Chapman Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Tulsa College of Law
3120 East 4th Place
Tulsa, OK  74105

918-631-3706 (voice)            
918-631-2194 (fax)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Dave Ball wrote:

What I always heard and sensed from teaching faculty is that "professor"
is more appreciated than "doctor" since there are lots of Ph.D.'s out
there who don't have teaching appointments (such as yours truly) but a
"professor" has achieved not only the degree but the academic status.



David T. Ball, J.D., Ph.D.
Associate Director
Ohio Legal Assistance Foundation
10 W. Broad St., Suite 950
Columbus, OH  43215
voice: 614-644-1582
fax: 614-728-3749
cell: 614-316-8222
www.olaf.org

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Monsma
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 2:10 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Dover Case

I've just finished reading all 139 pages.  I will  resist commenting on
the substance of Judge Jones' opinion, but I was struck by one thing.
Without exception, when referring to the plaintiffs' expert witnesses
(such as Miller and Padian), he refers to them as Dr. Miller, Dr. Padian
or Drs. Miller and Padian.  When referring to the defendants' expert
witnesses (such as Behe and
Munnich) he refers to them as Professor Behe, Professor Minnich,, or
Professors Behe and Munnich.  (I've checked and both Behe and Minnich
have earned
doctorates.)

Assuming (as I would) that holding a doctorate gives one more
credibility than simply being a professor at some college or university,
is this consistent use of titles an indication of a  bias on Judge
Jones' part?  Or am I reading too much into this?  Is there some more
innocent explanation?

Stephen Monsma



_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe,
unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly
or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.


_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to