Steve: I agree with your point about whiny victims and the culture of
complaint. But here is the problem. One group of whiny complainers
asks for a Pink Triangle to make them feel more welcome. This causes
another group of whiny complainers to complain about having the Pink
Triangles shoved down their throats. Which group of whiny complainers
should be appeased? What would be the more neutral way of resolving
this dispute between the dueling whiners?
Rick Duncan
Steve Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Rick Duncan :
What if a teacher walks into class, sees the display, and states
that he does not agree with its posting in his classroom. May the
school discipline him for merely making it clear that the display is
the message of the school board as opposed to that of the teacher
himself?
It be interesting to speculate, too, whether gay students would then
have some sort of disparate-impact and/or harassment claim (against the
teachers individually? the school board?) under the state or local
non-discrimination ordinances (there is no federal gay rights law, of
course).
I also think there is a non-constitutional religious liberty policy
issue when teachers are required to teach under a banner that
violates their sincerely held religious beliefs?
Rick, the problem with this, is seems to me (and like yours, this isn't
a legal argument, but a practical one), is that the vast majority of
religious believers (of all types) probably encounter, in their daily
work lives, any number of policies, things they are expected to do,
colleagues they are expected to put up with, etc., that they could
claim violate some sincerely held religious belief of theirs, if they
insisted on being strict and literal about it. But most people do what
they need to do to get by each day, if for no other reason than they've
absorbed the American ethos of live-and-let-live pluralism.
Not long ago, civic-republican oriented conservatives wrote books with
titles like "The Culture of Complaint," about how too many Americans
had become whiny, oversensitive rights-claimers to the exclusion of
larger notions of duty and citizenship. I confess, the idea of
teachers taking offense and asserting "rights" against policies that
are intended to help their own students learn in safer and more
effective environments strikes me as being just as regrettable.
Steve Sanders
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can
(rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
Rick Duncan
Welpton Professor of Law
University of Nebraska College of Law
Lincoln, NE 68583-0902
"When the Round Table is broken every man must follow either Galahad
or Mordred: middle things are gone." C.S.Lewis, Grand Miracle
"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed,
or numbered." --The Prisoner
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
With a free 1 GB, there's more in store with Yahoo! Mail.
