Unsure whether a current instance is responsive, but here it is, from
the Feb. 2007 issue of "Episcopal Life", p. 20:  "The Executive Board of
the Episcopal Diocese of Virginia on Jan. 18 authorized Bishop Peter Lee
to 'take such steps as may be necessary to recover or secure such real
and personal property' of 11 congregations where a majority of the
members and leaders have left the Episcopal Church."   There have been
no "immediate actions".

 

Daniel G. Gibbens 
Regents' Professor of Law Emeritus 
University of Oklahoma

 

 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Laycock
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 7:43 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: Question from a reporter

 

This is very helpful.  Of course, this is only reported cases  A more
complete data set for the years it covers is the Religious Freedom
Reporter, which runs from 1981 I think to the late 90s (or maybe the
very early 2000s).  Finding a library with a complete set can sometimes
be a challenge.  They had a network of lawyers sending them cases they
knew about, so they pick up a fair number of trial court cases that
never got reported.  Still not a complete population I'm sure.

Quoting "Hassler, Jeffrey (student)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:



> I'm just a law student, but I've been working on a student comment on
> civil court resolution of church property disputes, and there are at
> least some figures out there about church property cases in courts.
> I've pasted below a paragraph from my article discussing some informal
> research on the subject done by Prof. Greenawalt:
>
> Jeff
>
> ------------
>
> Church property disputes will never be the bread and butter of the
civil
> courts, but that doesn't mean controversies don't arise on a regular
> basis.  In 1998, Professor Greenawalt noted that courts have heard an
> average of about 119 church property cases each decade since 1948.[1]
> <outbind://105/#_ftn1
<https://web.mail.umich.edu/horde/services/go.php?url=outbind%3A%2F%2F10
5%2F%23_ftn1> >   The numbers reflect slight increases during
> periods of particular doctrinal disputation.  In the decade since
> Professor Greenawalt's tabulation, there were approximately 91 church
> property cases heard in the U.S.;[2] <outbind://105/#_ftn2
<https://web.mail.umich.edu/horde/services/go.php?url=outbind%3A%2F%2F10
5%2F%23_ftn2> >  this figure
> is consistent with earlier trends and the pattern indicates the
> possibility that the number is rising again, perhaps in response to
the
> increase in intradenominational strife described above.
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> [1] <outbind://105/#_ftnref1
<https://web.mail.umich.edu/horde/services/go.php?url=outbind%3A%2F%2F10
5%2F%23_ftnref1> >  Kent Greenawalt, Hands Off! Civil Court
> Involvement in Conflicts over Religious Property, 98 Colum. L. Rev.
> 1843, 1844 n.1. (1998).  Professor Greenawalt's findings are as
follows:
>
> The following data show the approximate number of reported cases in
both
> federal and state courts over a period of fifty years (amassed through
a
> Westlaw search).  The numbers reflect each time a different court had
to
> address the issue of church property; thus, appeals are counted
> separately.  From 1948 to 1957, there were approximately 166 cases;
from
> 1958-1967, roughly 109; from 1968-1977, 115 cases; from 1978-1987, 123
> cases; from 1988-1997, 81.  (This search was done in Oct. 1998, in the
> "Allcases" database).
>
> Id.
>
>
>
> [2] <outbind://105/#_ftnref2
<https://web.mail.umich.edu/horde/services/go.php?url=outbind%3A%2F%2F10
5%2F%23_ftnref2> >  This search was conducted in January
> 2007, using the criteria discussed in the previous note.  It reflects
> only nine years rather than a full decade, and thus will almost
> certainly under-represent the actual figure for the ten years
following
> Professor Greenawalt's search.
>
>
>
> -----------
>
> _______________
> Jeff Hassler
> Pepperdine School of Law
> 24255 Pacific Coast Hwy #0028
> Malibu, CA 90263-0028
> 310.506.3920
>
>
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>
>         From: Volokh, Eugene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>         Date: Feb 7, 2007 6:27 PM
>         Subject: Question from a reporter
>         To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <
> religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu <mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu> >
>
>         A reporter asked me:  "Is it my imagination, or are
> denominations and
>         members increasingly turning to the courts to settle disputes.
> [I've
>         seen]  current disputes within the Catholic, Episcopal,
Missouri
>
>         Lutheran faiths -- and there are doubtless more that I don't
> know about.
>         There are issues of personnel and property.   Does anyone
track
> such a
>         thing, or has the issue been studied?"  I didn't have an
answer,
> but
>         offered to ask on-list.  Any thoughts on this?  Thanks,
>
>         Eugene
>         _______________________________________________
>         To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
>         To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password,
see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
<https://web.mail.umich.edu/horde/services/go.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists
.ucla.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Freligionlaw> 
>
>         Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be
> viewed as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages
> that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members
can
> (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
>
>
>


Douglas Laycock
Yale Kamisar Collegiate Professor of Law
University of Michigan Law School
625 S. State St.
Ann Arbor, MI  48109-1215
  734-647-9713

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to