Today the Court ruled in CRST Van Expedited v. EEOC  (
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-1375_09m1.pdf ) that
defendants don't have to prevail "on the merits" to get attorney fees
in Title VII cases. In this case, the EEOC had gotten its suit brought
by over 200 women for sexual harassment dismissed by failing to follow
protocol and doing proper investigations, follow administrative
resolution protocols, etc. CRST asked for fees as a "prevailing party"
which the lower court awarded, but the Eighth Circuit reversed saying
there had to be a judgement on the merits.  Today the Supreme Court
reversed and said that prevailing party simply means you have to win.

Until now defendants had to show that plaintiffs cases were frivolous
and completely without merit in order to get fees while plaintiffs
simply had to win some money to get fees paid.

In my humble opinion, this case balances things out and puts
plaintiffs and defendants on an equal footing (i.e. "prevailing
party") although defendants will likely only get reimbursed their fees
if they are sued by the EEOC directly since most Title VIIs aren't
exactly wealthy.  The downside is that the EEOC may be unwilling to
take on most cases itself in the future if there is a likelihood of
losing while businesses will be more willing to fight all the way
knowing that they could recover thus leading to a chilling effect on
the big Title VII EEOC cases.

I'd be interested in your thoughts on the long-term effect on this
decision on future Title VII cases.

Michael Peabody, Esq.
http://www.religiousliberty.tv
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to