OK, I'm familiar with those single-point grounding panel protection devices.

How about a service panel protector for home use?

And a service panel protector for a small (200A) 3-phase panel?

I ask, rather than simply Google for it, because Google could come up with 
some units that are not good.

Chuck
WB2EDV



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff DePolo" <j...@broadsci.com>
To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 1:13 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] MOVs for power supply primary


>
> Hmmm.  That's a tougher one.  Mostly I use the Polyphasers (PLDO-120US-15A
> or -20A) at sites that don't have facility-wide protection.  The TrippLite
> Isobar Ultra series is another (ISOBAR8ULTRA et al).  The Isobars also 
> have
> a $50,000 equipment warranty (can't say I've ever had to use it, don't 
> know
> how much red tape there is to go through).  I like the Polyphasers because
> it's designed to mount to a ground panel/bus bar, so I mount it to the bus
> bar that has all of my other arrestors (coax, telco, etc.) on it to 
> provide
> a common-point ground.  The Isobar doesn't have provisions for direct
> grounding - it relies only on the equipment grounding conductor in the AC
> cord, but the TrippLite has arguably better EMI/RFI filtering than the
> Polyphaser.
>
> --- Jeff WN3A
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>> [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Chuck Kelsey
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 4:48 PM
>> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] MOVs for power supply primary
>>
>>
>>
>> OK, I should have been more specific. What would be a
>> reasonable unit for a
>> repeater site that may have only a couple thousand dollars worth of
>> equipment inside?
>>
>> Chuck
>> WB2EDV
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Jeff DePolo" <j...@broadsci.com <mailto:jd0%40broadsci.com> >
>> To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>> <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com> >
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 4:22 PM
>> Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] MOVs for power supply primary
>>
>> >
>> > Probably the ones I've had the most luck with are the
>> Islatrol series from
>> > Control Concepts. I think they have been bought out by
>> Emerson or Liebert
>> > or one of the other companies that have power divisions.
>> Anyway, they
>> > call
>> > these "active tracking filters". They not only are TVSS's
>> but also filter
>> > noise, low-amplitude spikes, etc. Right now I'm typing from
>> a mountaintop
>> > site (broadcast) that we re-built a few years ago. We put
>> in an Islator
>> > I-2100 (120/240V single-phase). The old equipment shelter
>> which had been
>> > here since 1990 had the same model unit. In the 15+ years we've been
>> > managing and maintaining the site, we've had zero
>> surge-related failures,
>> > and this site sticks out like a sore thumb as far as
>> lightning goes. In
>> > the
>> > last few years I've used the same series of arrestors for
>> new site builds
>> > at
>> > a dozen sites or so and have had no power-related problems.
>> >
>> > Others that make comparable-quality products include
>> Joslyn, Transtector,
>> > and Innovative Technologies.
>> >
>> > There is one big difference (to me anyway) between TVSS's,
>> that being
>> > whether they are the series or parallel type. Series type takes the
>> > utility
>> > service (or transfer switch output if there's a generator
>> too) as its
>> > input,
>> > and provides a protected output to feed the panel(s).
>> Parallel type is
>> > typically connected to a breaker in the panel, which puts
>> it in parallel
>> > with all of the loads. I much prefer series. Parallel type
>> can be less
>> > effective because a) there will always be some inductance
>> and resistance
>> > in
>> > the wiring between the panel and the protector, b) if the
>> TVSS conducts,
>> > there's a good chance it will trip the breaker in the
>> panel, resulting in
>> > no
>> > protection until the breaker is reset, and c) they are much
>> less effective
>> > as a noise filter. The upside to parallel type is they can
>> easily be
>> > added
>> > at any time just by popping breakers in the panel and feeding the
>> > arrestor.
>> > Series, on the other hand, are in-line with the service
>> conductors, so if
>> > you want to add one (or repair one), you have to take the
>> service down.
>> > Series tends to also be more expensive, especially for
>> three-phase and
>> > unlike parallel type, the price goes up as the current
>> rating goes up for
>> > obvious reasons.
>> >
>> > A good 200A single-phase arrestor of the ilk I'm talking
>> about starts at
>> > about $1000 and goes up quite a ways from there. I think these
>> > single-phase
>> > I-2100's were in the $2000 range. I recently spec'ed a
>> 120/208 3-phase
>> > Transtector (parallel type) for another site where I'm much
>> less concerned
>> > about power-wise, and that was about $1800. No cheap, but
>> where you're
>> > protecting equipment in the 6 and 7 figure range, it's a
>> no-brainer. If
>> > you're repeater is a Micor mobile and an Astron, it might be hard to
>> > justify... :-)
>> >
>> > --- Jeff
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.829 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2928 - Release Date: 06/09/10 
14:35:00

Reply via email to