ditto! USERS RULE! plug-in encryption modules, hiphip!
- ilyes
-------- Original Message --------
From: Eric Ullman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Encryption protection
To: retro-talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The *right* way to implement this is to let the USERS choose which
> encryption scheme THEY want to use. Dantz shouldn't be the one who chooses
> this. It could be as simple as a popup menu on the server that would decide
> which scheme to use. If I want DES, Blowfish, SSL, AES or whatever, then I
> should be able to use it. In fact, I could see this as a marketing
> opportunity for Dantz and/or Third Party's to provide "plugins" that provide
> different encryption scheme's as extra products. If someone wants more
> security, buy this product and put this plugin in the plugin's directory.
Very good ideas, Jon. You're not alone in your thinking, either.
Eric Ullman
Dantz Development
--
----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/>
For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.
--
----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/>
For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.
