On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 08:36:09AM -0800, inode0 wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Ray Van Dolson <rvandol...@esri.com> wrote: > > Some of this is a product RH acquired. I know they are working to > > replace the Windows version with a fully platform independent version, > > that wasn't realistic for this initial release. > > > > I'm sure there was many an internal debate on whether or not to wait on > > delivery until the Windows portion could be replaced... obviously they > > decided it would be better to move to market sooner. > > I just wish they would release RHEV-H independently of RHEV-M. > Wouldn't a KVM based Red Hat supported "ESXi" be great for the same > reasons ESXi exists? For the smaller customers who don't really need > RHEV-M or don't want to touch it in its current form to dip their feet > into the water? > > Maybe I'm just dreaming ... because RHEV-H is pretty much all I want > for some of my personal use cases. >
Won't they essentially need to release RHEV-H anyways? I guess not in a pretty-packaged format, but it's just a stripped down Linux kernel correct? I guess it wouldn't include a "single node" version of RHEV-M though (it requires Windows 2k3 currently), but perhaps RHEV-H is manageable via libvirt? Ray _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list rhelv5-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
