On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:43:23 -0500 "John Siracusa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JS> That's why I think the default unshared behavior is the "safest" in JS> that sharing now requires some action (and therefore some thought) on JS> the part of the developer. The required action is simple (usually a JS> line or two of code in one place, as you've seen) and I like the fact JS> that it forces the developer to actually formulate and stick to some JS> sort of overall policy for connection sharing, rather than just JS> winging it without really understanding what's going on. I think the automatic class builder should have a required option to set the default explicitly (it didn't, last time I looked). That would ensure the developer thought about it even in the path of least resistance. Ted ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
