On Monday, September 26, 2011, Ian Gardner wrote: > Ah yes, I did wonder about that when I put that in. I used the existing > code in the "turn repeats into copies" command as boilerplate code without > much extra thought I'm afraid, so the same fault exists in that command > too.
I wondered if you hadn't snagged that from somewhere else. We're supposed to have fixed all of these problems years ago, but apparently we haven't. It's not that big of a deal, but I felt it worth mentioning. I know the first time I encountered all of this, it kind of blew me away. Really? Languages have something other than singular and plural? I even speak about three of them halfway decently and can read several more, so it was that much more surprising to be so surprised. > Another fault with both repeats-to-copies and links-to-copies is that the > segment selection may comprise any collection of segments, be they > ordinary segments, copies, links or any mixture, so even if 10 segments > are selected and none of them are links or copies, the options to convert > to copies are still enabled, and the value of segments.size() will still > return 10. I'll try to tidy all that up (that won't affect the strings > though). Do you know how to tidy it up? I have a rough idea right off if you're stuck. If not, then by all means carry on! -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
