On Tuesday, January 31, 2012, Chris Cannam wrote: > [Is the problem] the fact that two different ones (any two) were in use? Or > is the root problem just that we didn't automate rebuilding the data bundle?
Both, really. If we add or remove data files, it's apparently necessary to run that script manually to pick up the changes. I probably left it that way on purpose, since adding and removing data files is done very infrequently, and there isn't much point in adding some constant source of overhead to try to make it work automatically. The other problem is the whole business with SVN, because the script checks to make sure files are in SVN before acknowledging they exist. That prevents you from adding foo.rg to your local tree, committing a version of data.cpp that references the file, then committing that version without the accompanying file. It's a sound principal, in my opinion, but it doesn't play nice with the Git to SVN bridge thing. If somebody works out a solution to that, I have no objection. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
