On Fri, Nov 15, 2013, at 06:27 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
> Possible approaches:
> 
>  * Roll that part back.  Much as I hate to just give up, it's causing
> Chris's crashes and this weirdness, and it was really just supposed to be
> an optimization and minimize what got rewritten.

That is probably the right thing to do, although it'd be nice to figure
out why the crash happens as well!

My problem with this, first time around, was basically that it was too
intrusive when editing existing material. But being both simpler and
more intrusive is going to make it more likely to be right and
comprehensible when entering new stuff.

(What happens when you edit material with wildly differing recorded and
notation times? It should presumably use the notation times as source
material...)

I would like to encourage everyone who can to test this branch -- I
think the approach looks like a very sound one, enough to have provoked
me from my slumbers, but there are many possible things that can go
wrong and my testing time is very limited. It should get merged and
released, most probably, but if it *just* gets merged and released
without really being exercised, it won't work.


Chris

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps
OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access
Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server.
Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

Reply via email to