rrg  

Messages by Date

• 2008/10/08 [RRG] Moving the list... Tony Li
• 2008/10/07 Re: [RRG] Re: ILNP Critique Robin Whittle
• 2008/10/05 Re: [RRG] Re: ILNP Critique Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/10/04 Re: [RRG] Re: ILNP Critique Steven Blake
• 2008/10/04 [RRG] Re: ILNP Critique RJ Atkinson
• 2008/10/02 Re: [RRG] Commetns about load split in LISP Dino Farinacci
• 2008/10/02 Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/10/01 RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Templin, Fred L
• 2008/10/01 Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/10/01 Re: [RRG] Solving the routing scaling problem for internal networks too? Ivip may be able to help Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/09/30 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones... IPv6 RIB burden adding to IPv4 burden in... HeinerHummel
• 2008/09/30 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones... IPv6 RIB burden adding to IPv4 burden in the same router? Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/30 [RRG] Solving the routing scaling problem for internal networks too? Ivip may be able to help Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/29 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Wesley George
• 2008/09/28 Re: [RRG] Re: Comparing APT & Ivip - new business models Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/28 [RRG] Re: Charging for updates in BGP Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/28 Re: [RRG] Charging for updates in BGP Geoff Huston
• 2008/09/28 [RRG] Re: Charging for updates in BGP Michael Meisel
• 2008/09/28 [RRG] Re: Comparing APT & Ivip Michael Meisel
• 2008/09/26 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/26 Re: [RRG] Elegance and the rejection of SHIM6 host-based multihoming Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/26 [RRG] Charging for updates in BGP Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/26 [RRG] Comparing APT & Ivip Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/26 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/25 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Michael Meisel
• 2008/09/25 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/09/25 RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Templin, Fred L
• 2008/09/25 RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Templin, Fred L
• 2008/09/25 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/24 Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Stephen Sprunk
• 2008/09/24 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Michael Meisel
• 2008/09/24 RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Tony Li
• 2008/09/24 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Michael Meisel
• 2008/09/24 RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Templin, Fred L
• 2008/09/24 Re: [RRG] Elegance and the rejection of SHIM6 host-based multihoming Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/09/24 Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Dino Farinacci
• 2008/09/23 RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Tony Li
• 2008/09/23 Re: [RRG] Elegance and the rejection of SHIM6 host-based multihoming Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/23 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/23 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Scott Brim
• 2008/09/23 RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Templin, Fred L
• 2008/09/23 RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Templin, Fred L
• 2008/09/23 Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Dino Farinacci
• 2008/09/23 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/09/23 Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/09/23 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Steven Blake
• 2008/09/23 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Michael Meisel
• 2008/09/23 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? David Conrad
• 2008/09/23 Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/09/23 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? David Conrad
• 2008/09/23 RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Templin, Fred L
• 2008/09/23 Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Dino Farinacci
• 2008/09/23 RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Templin, Fred L
• 2008/09/23 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/09/23 Re: [RRG] Elegance and the rejection of SHIM6 host-based multihoming Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/09/23 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Michael Meisel
• 2008/09/22 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/22 Re: [RRG] Elegance and the rejection of SHIM6 host-based multihoming Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/22 Re: [RRG] Re: Billions of micronets / EID prefixes Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/22 [RRG] Re: Billions of micronets / EID prefixes Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/09/22 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/09/22 Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Dino Farinacci
• 2008/09/22 [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/09/22 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Stephen Sprunk
• 2008/09/22 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Marshall Eubanks
• 2008/09/22 RE: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? HeinerHummel
• 2008/09/22 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/09/22 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Steven Blake
• 2008/09/22 Re: [RRG] Elegance and the rejection of SHIM6 host-based multihoming Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/09/22 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/09/22 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/09/22 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/22 [RRG] Billions of micronets / EID prefixes Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/22 Re: [RRG] Elegance and the rejection of SHIM6 host-based multihoming Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/22 RE: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Tony Li
• 2008/09/22 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Lan Wang
• 2008/09/21 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/09/21 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Dan Jen
• 2008/09/21 Re: Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Heinrich Hummel
• 2008/09/21 Re: Re: [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering... Heinrich Hummel
• 2008/09/21 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Steven Blake
• 2008/09/21 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Dan Jen
• 2008/09/21 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Steven Blake
• 2008/09/20 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Dan Jen
• 2008/09/20 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination He Yan
• 2008/09/20 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? David Conrad
• 2008/09/20 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/09/20 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Dan Jen
• 2008/09/20 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Steven Blake
• 2008/09/20 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/09/20 Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Michael Menth
• 2008/09/19 [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination Dan Jen
• 2008/09/19 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Scott Brim
• 2008/09/19 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Wesley George
• 2008/09/18 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/09/18 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Jari Arkko
• 2008/09/18 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Roland Dobbins
• 2008/09/18 Re: [RRG] Elegance and the rejection of SHIM6 host-based multihoming Jari Arkko
• 2008/09/18 RE: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Tony Li
• 2008/09/18 Re: [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering... Dino Farinacci
• 2008/09/17 Re: [RRG] Elegance and the rejection of SHIM6 host-based multihoming Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/09/17 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Wesley George
• 2008/09/17 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/09/17 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Roland Dobbins
• 2008/09/17 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Bruce Curtis
• 2008/09/17 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Roland Dobbins
• 2008/09/17 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Bruce Curtis
• 2008/09/17 Re: [RRG] Elegance and the rejection of SHIM6 host-based multihoming Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/09/17 RE: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Tony Li
• 2008/09/16 [RRG] Elegance and the rejection of SHIM6 host-based multihoming Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/16 Re: [RRG] drafty draft of Dublin RRG meeting minutes Lixia Zhang
• 2008/09/16 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Roland Dobbins
• 2008/09/16 Re: [RRG] Re: Practical Proposals vs. endless theoretical discussions David Conrad
• 2008/09/16 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Marshall Eubanks
• 2008/09/16 Re: [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering... Noel Chiappa
• 2008/09/16 RE: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Templin, Fred L
• 2008/09/16 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/09/16 RE: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Noel Chiappa
• 2008/09/16 Re: [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering... Scott Brim
• 2008/09/16 Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? Stephen Sprunk
• 2008/09/16 RE: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Templin, Fred L
• 2008/09/16 RE: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Templin, Fred L
• 2008/09/16 RE: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Templin, Fred L
• 2008/09/16 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/09/16 RE: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Templin, Fred L
• 2008/09/16 Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/09/16 RE: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)
• 2008/09/16 RE: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users Templin, Fred L
• 2008/09/11 [RRG] Running on Empty: the challenge of managing Internet addresses Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/11 Re: [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering... Robert Bonomi
• 2008/09/11 [RRG] Renumbering and Renumbering RJ Atkinson
• 2008/09/10 [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering... Tony Li
• 2008/09/07 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Dino Farinacci
• 2008/09/07 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Stephen Sprunk
• 2008/09/07 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Dino Farinacci
• 2008/09/06 [RRG] Multiple PA blocks Olivier Bonaventure
• 2008/09/05 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Stephen Sprunk
• 2008/09/05 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Stephen Sprunk
• 2008/09/05 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Scott Brim
• 2008/09/05 RE: [RRG] Renumbering... Tony Li
• 2008/09/05 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Scott Brim
• 2008/09/05 RE: [RRG] Renumbering... Noel Chiappa
• 2008/09/04 [RRG] "No renumbering" for any networks precludes scalable support for packets from non-upgraded networks Robin Whittle
• 2008/09/04 [RRG] Consensus reached: renumbering Tony Li
• 2008/09/04 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... David Conrad
• 2008/09/04 [RRG] Splitting the problem Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/09/04 Re: RE: [RRG] Renumbering... Heinrich Hummel
• 2008/09/03 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Scott Brim
• 2008/09/03 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Dino Farinacci
• 2008/09/03 RE: [RRG] Renumbering... Tony Li
• 2008/09/03 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Dino Farinacci
• 2008/09/03 RE: [RRG] Renumbering... Tony Li
• 2008/09/03 RE: [RRG] Renumbering... Tony Li
• 2008/09/03 RE: [RRG] Renumbering... Tony Li
• 2008/09/03 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Dino Farinacci
• 2008/09/03 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Scott Brim
• 2008/09/03 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Scott Brim
• 2008/09/03 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... David Conrad
• 2008/09/03 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Stephen Sprunk
• 2008/09/03 RE: [RRG] Renumbering... Tony Li
• 2008/09/03 RE: [RRG] Renumbering... Tony Li
• 2008/09/03 RE: [RRG] Renumbering... Templin, Fred L
• 2008/09/03 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Scott Brim
• 2008/09/03 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Dino Farinacci
• 2008/09/03 RE: [RRG] Renumbering... Tony Li
• 2008/09/03 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Scott Brim
• 2008/09/03 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/09/03 Re: Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Heinrich Hummel
• 2008/09/02 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Stephen Sprunk
• 2008/09/02 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... David Williamson
• 2008/09/02 RE: [RRG] Renumbering... Tony Li
• 2008/09/02 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Noel Chiappa
• 2008/09/02 Re: [RRG] Stretch in case of LISP+ALT Dino Farinacci
• 2008/09/02 Re: Re: [RRG] Stretch in case of LISP+ALT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2008/09/02 Re: [RRG] Stretch in case of LISP+ALT Dino Farinacci
• 2008/09/02 [RRG] Stretch in case of LISP+ALT Heinrich Hummel
• 2008/08/31 Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - all networks need not be treated the same Robin Whittle
• 2008/08/31 RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering Tony Li
• 2008/08/31 RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering Tony Li
• 2008/08/31 Re: [RRG] PI as a non-requirement Stephen Sprunk
• 2008/08/30 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Eliot Lear
• 2008/08/30 Re: Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Heinrich Hummel
• 2008/08/29 [RRG] Administrivia: mailing list management Tony Li
• 2008/08/29 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Stephen Sprunk
• 2008/08/28 Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering Robin Whittle
• 2008/08/28 Re: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering Heinrich Hummel
• 2008/08/28 Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering Dino Farinacci
• 2008/08/28 [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering Tony Li
• 2008/08/26 Re: [RRG] Renumbering... Scott Brim
• 2008/08/26 RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension Templin, Fred L
• 2008/08/26 Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/08/26 RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension Templin, Fred L
• 2008/08/26 Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension Bruce Curtis
• 2008/08/26 Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension Tim Chown
• 2008/08/26 Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - question lacks detail Robin Whittle
• 2008/08/26 Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/08/26 Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension Eliot Lear
• 2008/08/25 Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension Christopher Morrow
• 2008/08/25 Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension Dale W. Carder
• 2008/08/25 Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension Dale W. Carder

• Earlier messages