Hi Dino, |> Assuming current renumbering technology, what amount of renumbering |> can be required in the RRG's recommended routing architecture? | |"current renumbering technology" could mean a whole lot of things |including typing in new addresses.
Indeed. Current techology includes a lot of manual work, scripting, and DHCP. In some cases, it may also involve some site management tools. I'm told that Tivoli, for example, can help with this. |"amount" doesn't provide any value |and can't be quantified to any value. The amount is specified in the options of the poll: 1. None at all 2. Once only 3. Once per ISP added or dropped 4. Lots |And "RRG recommend |architecture" |is also vague. Does it mean a new routing architecture or the Loc/ID |split architectures we have been discussing? Yes. Again, the RRG is chartered to recommend a new routing and addressing architecture. Currently the locator/identifier split has the largest mindshare. Tony -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg