On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 02:56:59AM +0100, Günter Kukkukk wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2009 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:56:27AM +0000, tom m. wrote: > > > > > > I'm not against doing that, but does add some work: rebuild extended > > > attribute > > > support in kernel, change fstab, etc. But if I do this, what will be the > > > state > > > of all the attribute bits of existing files? That is, will files marked > > > Read-only now suddenly be not Read-only? How about System/Hidden files? > > > > Yes, you'll lose current DOS attribute mapping, but you'll > > be much happier in the long run :-). > > > > Jeremy. > > Hi Jeremy, > but we have a bug here - the old wellknown "map readonly = Yes" stuff isn't > working > anymore. Just did a test on latest v3-3-test. > Digging deeper now ... it's related to (current) NTCreateAndX
Logged it as bug #6186, I've attached the patch and described the workaround. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
