Apologies in advance for excerpting or leaving out the messages sent to the
list as i was in digest mode so got them all in one lump.
Rudi Ahlers:
You could assign a LABEL to each hard drive. The LABEL is attached to the
drive's UID (I think?) so even if you move the drive to anther port it will
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Cal Sawyer wrote:
> Apologies in advance for excerpting or leaving out the messages sent to the
> list as i was in digest mode so got them all in one lump.
>
> Rudi Ahlers:
>
> You could assign a LABEL to each hard drive. The LABEL is attached to the
> drive's UID
Hi,
We are a Channel product team within LSI and we are trying to add Cent OS 5.5
to our compatibility Matrix. We found out that LSI currently has a relationship
with CentOS for another project on the Internal Storage division but not with
the OS Certification team. We require some information
The reason for the udev hotplug rule is simply for the purpose of mounting
removable devices as read-only. If udev is left to its devices, everything
plugged up is read-write which is verboten in this application. Unfortunately,
there seems to be no way (i've found) to distinguish, at device/b
Nope sir. Assume never the same device twice and no control over those
devices, so UUID is out of the question.
thank you,
- csawyer
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Rudi Ahlers
Sent: 01 April 2011 09:24
To: CentOS mailing list
Cc: Cal
Hi All,
I have a WD RE4-GP which dropped an Adaptec 51645 RAID controller. I ran a
smartctl short test on the drive and it failed with a read error. So I ran
the Western Digital's own diagnostic software (DLGDIAG), both the short
and extended test on the drive and it passed with no errors. So
At Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:05:35 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> The reason for the udev hotplug rule is simply for the purpose of mounting
> removable devices as read-only. If udev is left to its devices, everything
> plugged up is read-write which is verboten in this application.
> Unfort
Hi Folks,
I know, that there is Samba Vers. 3..38 for WIN7-Clients.
But what's about libsmbclient?
There's only Vers. 3.033.
Can I use / Have I to use this libraries for samba 3.3.8
Thx
Timothy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cen
On Friday, April 01, 2011 04:23:40 am Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Yes, that's why you assign a LABEL to the device :)
According to the OP's initial message, I think he's already doing this:
>> SATA system HDD /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 /
>> RAID array LABEL=STORE /store ## mount
> One we start our qualification, we might need some help in resolving
> issues/defects on CentOS. Can we open a channel or Point of contact who will
> be able to help us out with such issues.
>
>
>
> I would also request to forward this email to the right forum if the mailing
> list we are sending
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> Nope sir. Assume never the same device twice and no control
> over those devices, so UUID is out of the question.
UUID is out of the question where I have 3 drives (main and two backup)
with "wear leveling" wherein ANY of the drives, put in /dev/sda's
position,
Nope, no LVM on the RIAD array. It just needs to load right after the main LVM
so that something removable doesn't wiggle its way in and mess up the device
order.
Yes, the suggestion from Robert H looks promising - working on it now. Did i
say i hate udev? I thought there was going to be a r
I think that everyone lese lives in a far more ordered universe than i
do. My "problem" - no, wait - "challenge" is that i have zero control
over the origin of incoming media on USB and eSATA. Could be any brand
of USB stick sold under the sun or HDDs formatted FAT32, NTFS, ext2/3.
The only const
On Friday, April 01, 2011 09:53:06 am Cal Sawyer wrote:
> Nope, no LVM on the RIAD array. It just needs to load right after the main
> LVM so that something removable doesn't wiggle its way in and mess up the
> device order.
Ok, so the LVM line was for the previous filesystem; it wasn't complet
on 4/1/2011 4:35 AM Steve Brooks spake the following:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have a WD RE4-GP which dropped an Adaptec 51645 RAID controller. I ran a
> smartctl short test on the drive and it failed with a read error. So I ran
> the Western Digital's own diagnostic software (DLGDIAG), both the short
> I have a WD RE4-GP which dropped an Adaptec 51645 RAID
>controller. I ran a smartctl short test on the drive and it failed
>with a read error.
What does smart say about reallocated sectors, pending sector count, drive
temperature, etc?
___
CentOS m
At Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:04:04 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> I think that everyone lese lives in a far more ordered universe than i
> do. My "problem" - no, wait - "challenge" is that i have zero control
> over the origin of incoming media on USB and eSATA. Could be any brand
> of USB stic
On my CentOS box that I use mainly as a web server, I have iptables
set to log and reject anything that I don't expect. So lately,
I have getting things like this:
Mar 29 17:27:20 mbrc20 kernel: IPT-DROP IN= OUT=lo SRC=192.168.9.20
DST=192.168.9.20 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=46910 DF P
I am trying to mount a logical volume for creating new initrd image.
The lvs command is showing a logical volume with 'd' attribute -
device present without tables. It's getting listed under /dev/mapper
but not under /dev/VolGroup00. Any help on what might be wrong here?
--
thanks,
neuby.r
___
Michael D. Berger wrote:
> On my CentOS box that I use mainly as a web server, I have iptables
> set to log and reject anything that I don't expect. So lately,
> I have getting things like this:
>
>
> Mar 29 17:27:20 mbrc20 kernel: IPT-DROP IN= OUT=lo SRC=192.168.9.20
> DST=192.168.9.20 LEN=60 TOS
dmesg is not reporting any issues.
The /proc/mdstat looks fine.
md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
X blocks [2/2] [UU]
however /var/log/messages says:
smartd[3392] Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
The machine is running fine.. raid array looks good - what
is up with smartd?
on 4/1/2011 8:22 AM neubyr spake the following:
> I am trying to mount a logical volume for creating new initrd image.
> The lvs command is showing a logical volume with 'd' attribute -
> device present without tables. It's getting listed under /dev/mapper
> but not under /dev/VolGroup00. Any help
on 4/1/2011 8:32 AM Jerry Geis spake the following:
> dmesg is not reporting any issues.
>
> The /proc/mdstat looks fine.
> md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
> X blocks [2/2] [UU]
>
> however /var/log/messages says:
>
> smartd[3392] Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
>
> The
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:32:16 -0400, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
> Michael D. Berger wrote:
[...]
>
> Not great on this, but *if* I understand it, it's saying that the IP
> address of your server is 192.168.9.20, and it's talking to itself, at
> destination port 80 - apache, that would be
Michael D. Berger wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:32:16 -0400, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
>
>> Michael D. Berger wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Not great on this, but *if* I understand it, it's saying that the IP
>> address of your server is 192.168.9.20, and it's talking to itself, at
>> destinat
Jerry Geis wrote:
> dmesg is not reporting any issues.
>
> The /proc/mdstat looks fine.
> md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
> X blocks [2/2] [UU]
>
> however /var/log/messages says:
>
> smartd[3392] Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
>
> The machine is running fine.. raid array
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:55:37 +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
[...]
>
> you might be able to see the process with netstat when it's happening.
I tried that; so far without success.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.
Michael D. Berger wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:55:37 +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>
> [...]
>>
>> you might be able to see the process with netstat when it's happening.
>
> I tried that; so far without success.
> Mike.
Hmmm, maybe lsof.
mark
ack, i can feel my hair greying ... again. *But*, i do appreciate your insight
into the future direction of CentOS device handling. Having read this, i'm
going to bite the bullet and dive into smarting-up my udev rules, feeding a
handler script that will decide what to do about what kind of de
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:29 AM, compdoc wrote:
> > I have a WD RE4-GP which dropped an Adaptec 51645 RAID
> >controller. I ran a smartctl short test on the drive and it failed
> >with a read error.
>
> What does smart say about reallocated sectors, pending sector count, drive
> temperature, etc?
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, compdoc wrote:
>> I have a WD RE4-GP which dropped an Adaptec 51645 RAID
>> controller. I ran a smartctl short test on the drive and it failed
>> with a read error.
>
> What does smart say about reallocated sectors, pending sector count, drive
> temperature, etc?
They are cle
Brandon Ooi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:29 AM, compdoc wrote:
>
>> > I have a WD RE4-GP which dropped an Adaptec 51645 RAID
>> >controller. I ran a smartctl short test on the drive and it failed
>> >with a read error.
>>
>> What does smart say about reallocated sectors, pending sector count,
On 3/24/2011 11:03 AM, Windsor Dave L. (AdP/TEF7.1) wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I recently installed CentOS 5.5 x86_64 on a brand new ProLiant DL380 G7. I
> have identical OS software running reock-solid on two other DL380 ProLiant
> servers, but they are G6 models, not G7. On the G7, the
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Jerry Geis wrote:
> dmesg is not reporting any issues.
>
> The /proc/mdstat looks fine.
> md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
>X blocks [2/2] [UU]
>
> however /var/log/messages says:
>
> smartd[3392] Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
>
> The machine is runnin
On 1.4.2011 17:20, Michael D. Berger wrote:
> On my CentOS box that I use mainly as a web server, I have iptables
> set to log and reject anything that I don't expect. So lately,
> I have getting things like this:
>
>
> Mar 29 17:27:20 mbrc20 kernel: IPT-DROP IN= OUT=lo SRC=192.168.9.20
> DST=1
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 22:10:58 +0200, Markus Falb wrote:
[...]
>> Mar 29 17:27:20 mbrc20 kernel: IPT-DROP IN= OUT=lo SRC=192.168.9.20
>> DST=192.168.9.20 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=46910 DF PROTO=TCP
>> SPT=56624 DPT=80 WINDOW=32792 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 OPT
>> (0204400C0402080A4A26F7A500
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I'm trying to install CentOS-5.5 on my new HP micro-server,
> which has no CD drive.
>
> I've set up cobbler and cobbler-web on my old server,
> and can access cobbler-web from my laptop.
Just to end the story.
Having found the DVD ISO with the help of this newsgroup,
I i
Sorry, folks. I wish our release developers well, and hope that they
can open up their processes to allow much needed community involvment.
But I've hopped to Scientific Linux and find it much more usable due
to their willingness to publish updates even without the entire new
release bundled, and t
--- On Fri, 4/1/11, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> From: Timothy Murphy
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5
> To: centos@centos.org
> Date: Friday, April 1, 2011, 5:46 PM
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to install CentOS-5.5 on my new HP
> micro-server,
> > which has
On 04/01/2011 09:37 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Sorry, folks. I wish our release developers well, and hope that they
> can open up their processes to allow much needed community involvment.
> But I've hopped to Scientific Linux and find it much more usable due
> to their willingness to publish u
On 04/01/11 6:54 PM, Digimer wrote:
> I would not fault someone for "moving on", but I would when said person
> does so in a manner that only leads to unhelpful drama.
yeah, seriously. call the WHAHmbulance.
meh.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@ce
41 matches
Mail list logo
