Re: [Fink-users] Can't Update libx264-shlibs with OS 10.4.11 Either

2009-02-05 Thread Mike Zanker
On 04/02/09 15:28, Martin Costabel wrote: > Then "fink update gtk+2-shlibs". After that, building libx264-57-shlibs > should succeed. Yup, this works. Do we have to back out this workaround when an "official" fink update is committed? Thanks, Mike ---

Re: [Fink-users] Can't Update libx264-shlibs with OS 10.4.11 Either

2009-02-05 Thread Martin Costabel
Mike Zanker wrote: [] > Do we have to back out this workaround when an > "official" fink update is committed? If you use selfupdate-rsync, your modification will be overwritten. So there is nothing to worry about. If you use selfupdate-cvs, it is possible that a cvs conflict appears. In this ca

Re: [Fink-users] Can't Update libx264-shlibs with OS 10.4.11 Either

2009-02-05 Thread Martin Costabel
drjl...@netonecom.net wrote: [] > I corrected the ^M using the HexEdit application (and verified that the > instance found and corrected of ^M was the only one in the file) but I > still got > > failed to load "x264.ico": Couldn't recognize the image file format for > file 'x264.ico' > > However,

Re: [Fink-users] Can't Update libx264-shlibs with OS 10.4.11 Either

2009-02-05 Thread drjlevi
At 11:33 AM -0500 2/5/09, Martin Costabel wrote: drjl...@netonecom.net wrote: Martin, your script didn't work for some reason. I got the following message: Scanning package description files...WARNING: End of file reached during here-document in "/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome/gtk

Re: [Fink-users] Can't Update libx264-shlibs with OS 10.4.11 Either

2009-02-05 Thread Mike Zanker
On 04/02/09 15:28, Martin Costabel wrote: > Then "fink update gtk+2-shlibs". After that, building libx264-57-shlibs > should succeed. Yup, this works. Do we have to back out this workaround when an "official" fink update is committed? Thanks, Mike ---

Re: [Fink-users] Can't Update libx264-shlibs with OS 10.4.11 Either

2009-02-04 Thread Martin Costabel
drjl...@netonecom.net wrote: > Martin, your script didn't work for some reason. I got the following message: > > Scanning package description files...WARNING: End of file reached > during here-document in > "/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome/gtk+2.info". > > I'm attaching my amended

Re: [Fink-users] Can't Update libx264-shlibs with OS 10.4.11 Either

2009-02-04 Thread drjlevi
Martin, your script didn't work for some reason. I got the following message: Scanning package description files...WARNING: End of file reached during here-document in "/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome/gtk+2.info". I'm attaching my amended version of the info file. Do you see anyth

Re: [Fink-users] Can't Update libx264-shlibs with OS 10.4.11 Either

2009-02-04 Thread Stan Sanderson
On Feb 4, 2009, at 9:28 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > drjl...@netonecom.net wrote: >> I can't understand from notes by Martin et al -- is there some kind >> of >> workaround for this while the problem's being fixed? -- Jonathan > > My workaround is the following, based on the patch indicated by

Re: [Fink-users] Can't Update libx264-shlibs with OS 10.4.11 Either

2009-02-04 Thread Martin Costabel
drjl...@netonecom.net wrote: > I can't understand from notes by Martin et al -- is there some kind of > workaround for this while the problem's being fixed? -- Jonathan My workaround is the following, based on the patch indicated by Ian Allison: Edit the file /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finki

[Fink-users] Can't Update libx264-shlibs with OS 10.4.11 Either

2009-02-04 Thread drjlevi
I can't understand from notes by Martin et al -- is there some kind of workaround for this while the problem's being fixed? -- Jonathan -- Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM) soft