Re: [abcusers] Multivoice in ABC 2.0

[Barry Say]

On 14 Oct 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Barry, I agree about putting things in the V: header (or other
 headers).  V: makes sense for type specific things.
 
 I disagree about removing the [] in front of the lines for voice
 change.  The reason is that, for instance abcd is a valid voice name
 in the new standard and is also valid tune body, so the parser has to
 work a lot harder (slower) to get this to work.

I dont see the problem. The first token following The V: tag must be 
a label. In multivoice a V: tag without a label is useless. for a 
single voice, that voice would either have the label defined in the 
tuneheader or none.

I do not like the unnecessary proliferation of inline fields of 
ABC2.0. I fear it will lead to more syntax errors.
Barry Say
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

[abcusers] Sorting ABC files

[Phil Headford]

I've written a little routine which runs under Windows 3.1, 95, 98
It's a bit like Noddy, wobbles a bit, but the bell on the hat still rings.

Phil (Flos) Headford
fiddle: Old Swan Band, The English Country Dance Band, Cwm Dancing, Big Bad Contra







To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

[abcusers] Sorting ABC files

[Phil Headford]

I've written a little routine which runs under Windows 3.1, 95, 98
It's a bit like Noddy, wobbles a bit, but the bell on the hat still rings.

Phil (Flos) Headford
fiddle: Old Swan Band, The English Country Dance Band, Cwm Dancing, Big Bad Contra





To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html