On 14 Oct 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Barry, I agree about putting things in the V: header (or other > headers). V: makes sense for type specific things. > > I disagree about removing the [] in front of the lines for voice > change. The reason is that, for instance abcd is a valid voice name > in the new standard and is also valid tune body, so the parser has to > work a lot harder (slower) to get this to work.
I dont see the problem. The first token following The V: tag must be a label. In multivoice a V: tag without a label is useless. for a single voice, that voice would either have the label defined in the tuneheader or none. I do not like the unnecessary proliferation of inline fields of ABC2.0. I fear it will lead to more syntax errors. Barry Say To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
