[abcusers] speed of mailings archives

2002-01-31 Thread Toby Rider

I've been watching how the speed of the discussion on this list has
picked up since I put the new fast mailserver in place. It's making me
smile :-)
I am currently working on putting the entire archive of postings for
the list from the past few years online and indexing the postings with
Thunderstone search. I know some folks on here are sensitive about
having their email addresses visible on the internet. I could avoid that
by password protecting the archive(s). If the list members think that is
a good solution, or have a better solution, let me know. Thanks!


Toby Rider
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] speed of mailings archives

2002-01-31 Thread Jack Campin

 I've been watching how the speed of the discussion on this list has
 picked up since I put the new fast mailserver in place.

I dunno about the speed (given how slow my machines are I could hardly
tell) but having a real honest-to-god From line at last is a *huge*
relief.


 I am currently working on putting the entire archive of postings for
 the list from the past few years online and indexing the postings with
 Thunderstone search. I know some folks on here are sensitive about
 having their email addresses visible on the internet. I could avoid that
 by password protecting the archive(s). If the list members think that is
 a good solution, or have a better solution, let me know. Thanks!

A better solution would be to edit out the email addresses and replace
them by names or handles so the archive ends up looking like a typical
web discussion board (e.g. Mudcat).  I don't mind who sees the content
of what I've written so long as it doesn't lead to even more spam than
I'm getting now.

=== http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/ ===


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] speed of mailings archives

2002-01-31 Thread John Chambers

Toby writes:
| Jack Campin wrote:
|  A better solution would be to edit out the email addresses and replace
|  them by names or handles so the archive ends up looking like a typical
|  web discussion board (e.g. Mudcat).  I don't mind who sees the content
|  of what I've written so long as it doesn't lead to even more spam than
|  I'm getting now.
|
|   I could write a script to do that.. I'll just replace anything after @,
| but before the . with a bunch of x's.

Or maybe just rewrite the @ as  AT  or : as others do. This seems
to  be  something  that humans can handle but is typically beyond the
capacity of software that is grovelling through zillions of web pages
and can't afford to use much intelligence.

I've also noticed that my MIT email addresses are in lots  of  usenet
archives, but this doesn't seem to lead to much spam.  I suspect that
spammers have learned that archives  tend  to  be  full  of  outdated
addresses, so they try to avoid them. (So maybe the thing to do is to
change all the dates to 10 years earlier.  ;-)

Actually, I get a lot more Microsoft email viruses than  spam.   I've
tried  to  tell  them  that it doesn't do any good to send viruses to
someone who reads his email on a FreeBSD or linux machine,  but  they
don't listen to me.

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html