Re: [apple-crop] apple anti-cancer research

2013-04-18 Thread Phil Glaize
David and Robert,

Your discussion has been interesting. I am forwarding your information
to my daughter who is a student at Oregon Health and Science University. She
is getting her degree in Dietetics and Nutrition and is insatiable when it
comes to learning. Thanks for posting on apple-crop.

Phil Glaize

Virginia grower.. heading into bloom

 

From: apple-crop-boun...@virtualorchard.net
[mailto:apple-crop-boun...@virtualorchard.net] On Behalf Of David Doud
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 9:07 PM
To: Apple-crop discussion list
Subject: Re: [apple-crop] apple anti-cancer research

 

 

 

 

On Apr 17, 2013, at 2:04 PM, robjwal...@gmail.com wrote:





David:

 

Thanks for the PDF.  As I had thought, the only cell type studied was HT29,
a human colon cancer cell line.  No other tumor cell types or, more
importantly, normal cell types were studied here.  Proper experimental
controls were not done, so the results cannot be generalized beyond the
obvious findings...the apple extract used can kill one type of tumor cell in
tissue culture, but so can a thousand other things.

 

Also, there did not appear to be any vehicle controls used.  The preparation
of the apple extract is given in great detail, but the final product is
dried powder.  This powder had to be dissolved and sterilized before adding
it to cultured cells, but the solvent used as the vehicle for this is not
stated as far as I can tell, and it is never tested by itself to see if the
vehicle alone has any toxic effects on the cells.  Often DMSO is used as a
vehicle for difficult to solubilize compounds and even diluted DMSO can
injure or kill cells depending on the dose and time of exposure.  There are
'control' groups mentioned here and there in the paper, but a control group
of cells that simply has nothing added to it (no apple extract, no FU, no
vehicle) is not the same as a vehicle control.  Because the study was
performed in considerable detail, one would hope that vehicle controls were
performed, but this must be stated explicitly in the paper or else it cannot
be assumed.

 

Interestingly, the authors cite another paper (reference 11) where they
showed that oral administration of LMWAP effectively protected

ICR mice against CRC (LMWAP is a mixture of polysaccharides isolated from
apples; CRC is colorectal carcinoma).  

 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22429028

 

Again, this paper is not in my library's PDF collection, but if they are
referring to the ICR mice that I am familiar with
(http://www.taconic.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=758), it is impossible to
demonstrate this effect in that mouse.  The ICR mouse is just a regular
white mouse with an intact immune system.  This experiment cannot be done in
such a mouse because it requires a mouse with a defective immune system that
will permit human colon carcinoma cells to grow unimpeded.

 

And so it goes...

 

Robert Walter

 

 

 

On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:32 PM, robjwal...@gmail.com wrote:





This journal is kind of obscure and I can't get this article from my
university library, but would be interested in seeing it in its entirety.
If someone could get it to me as a PDF, I'd appreciate it.  Cancer
chemopreventatives, carcinogenesis, and cell culture happen to be among my
specialties.  Based on the abstract, I'll make a few comments.  Of late, the
Chinese have made a great effort in the area of chemopreventatives probably
due to their long cutural history of traditional or herbal medicine.  Many
studies like the one in question have been published over the past 10-15
years using cultured human tumor cells treated with this or that naturally
occurring agent including curcumin, resveratrol, silibinin, bitter melon
extract, etc.  Many of them show cytotoxic effects on tumor cells similar to
those seen in the apple study.  So, right away, we must ask, why haven't we
stopped cancer using these agents?

 

Unfortunately, most of these studies suffer from the same failing.  The
apple study showed a dose-dependent killing of cultured human tumor cells
and assayed several apoptosis-related or cell cycle-related peptides or
proteins.  This seems convincing because these assays test for peptides that
are of current interest in apoptosis studies, but here they only confirm
that the cells are dying and point to the stage of cell cycle in which they
are dying, nothing more.  The problem is that cells in culture can be killed
by almost anything and it will occur in a dose-related manner.  Increasing
doses of any salt like NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, CaCl2; any amino acid like
glutamine, alanine, or glycine; any sugar like glucose, sucrose, or mannose;
hormones like insulin, transferrin, or estrogen; even distilled water will
kill cultured cells with increasing doses.  This doesn't mean that they are
specific for tumor cells, just that they will kill cells in culture and when
the cells die, their expression of Bax, Bcl, Cdk, and cyclins will change in
predictable ways.  The control that is usually

Re: [apple-crop] apple anti-cancer research

2013-04-18 Thread David Doud
Phil: Your daughter might be interested how this originated - on a forum, a 
friend, who buys into a lot of sketchy material,  posted this link to a 
'popular' website 
http://naturalsociety.com/apple-extract-kills-cancer-cells-outperforms-chemo-drugs/
 - 

so - I'm guessing many more people will see the claim Study: Apple Extract 
Kills Cancer Cells, Outperforms Common Chemo Drugs than will be exposed to any 
critique such as Robert Walter posted for us - bogus is bogus, and altho this 
would, on the surface, seem to be positive for apples, it's cheating and not a 
prosperous way to promote ourselves

David Doud
grower IN
thunderstorms, rain and floods, tornado watch, gonna be a while before I get 
anything else planted - and wondering how effective that COCS applied last 
sunday at 1/4 green is today...



On Apr 18, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Phil Glaize wrote:

 David and Robert,
 Your discussion has been interesting. I am forwarding your information to 
 my daughter who is a student at Oregon Health and Science University. She is 
 getting her degree in Dietetics and Nutrition and is insatiable when it comes 
 to learning. Thanks for posting on apple-crop.
 Phil Glaize
 Virginia grower…. heading into bloom
  
 From: apple-crop-boun...@virtualorchard.net 
 [mailto:apple-crop-boun...@virtualorchard.net] On Behalf Of David Doud
 Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 9:07 PM
 To: Apple-crop discussion list
 Subject: Re: [apple-crop] apple anti-cancer research
  
  
  
  
 On Apr 17, 2013, at 2:04 PM, robjwal...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 David:
  
 Thanks for the PDF.  As I had thought, the only cell type studied was HT29, a 
 human colon cancer cell line.  No other tumor cell types or, more 
 importantly, normal cell types were studied here.  Proper experimental 
 controls were not done, so the results cannot be generalized beyond the 
 obvious findings...the apple extract used can kill one type of tumor cell in 
 tissue culture, but so can a thousand other things.
  
 Also, there did not appear to be any vehicle controls used.  The preparation 
 of the apple extract is given in great detail, but the final product is dried 
 powder.  This powder had to be dissolved and sterilized before adding it to 
 cultured cells, but the solvent used as the vehicle for this is not stated as 
 far as I can tell, and it is never tested by itself to see if the vehicle 
 alone has any toxic effects on the cells.  Often DMSO is used as a vehicle 
 for difficult to solubilize compounds and even diluted DMSO can injure or 
 kill cells depending on the dose and time of exposure.  There are 'control' 
 groups mentioned here and there in the paper, but a control group of cells 
 that simply has nothing added to it (no apple extract, no FU, no vehicle) is 
 not the same as a vehicle control.  Because the study was performed in 
 considerable detail, one would hope that vehicle controls were performed, but 
 this must be stated explicitly in the paper or else it cannot be assumed.
  
 Interestingly, the authors cite another paper (reference 11) where they 
 showed that oral administration of LMWAP effectively protected
 ICR mice against CRC (LMWAP is a mixture of polysaccharides isolated from 
 apples; CRC is colorectal carcinoma).  
  
 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22429028
  
 Again, this paper is not in my library's PDF collection, but if they are 
 referring to the ICR mice that I am familiar with 
 (http://www.taconic.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=758), it is impossible to 
 demonstrate this effect in that mouse.  The ICR mouse is just a regular white 
 mouse with an intact immune system.  This experiment cannot be done in such a 
 mouse because it requires a mouse with a defective immune system that will 
 permit human colon carcinoma cells to grow unimpeded.
  
 And so it goes...
  
 Robert Walter
  
  
  
 On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:32 PM, robjwal...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 This journal is kind of obscure and I can't get this article from my 
 university library, but would be interested in seeing it in its entirety.  If 
 someone could get it to me as a PDF, I'd appreciate it.  Cancer 
 chemopreventatives, carcinogenesis, and cell culture happen to be among my 
 specialties.  Based on the abstract, I'll make a few comments.  Of late, the 
 Chinese have made a great effort in the area of chemopreventatives probably 
 due to their long cutural history of traditional or herbal medicine.  Many 
 studies like the one in question have been published over the past 10-15 
 years using cultured human tumor cells treated with this or that naturally 
 occurring agent including curcumin, resveratrol, silibinin, bitter melon 
 extract, etc.  Many of them show cytotoxic effects on tumor cells similar to 
 those seen in the apple study.  So, right away, we must ask, why haven't we 
 stopped cancer using these agents?
  
 Unfortunately, most of these studies suffer from the same failing.  The apple 
 study showed a dose-dependent killing of cultured human

[apple-crop] apple anti-cancer research

2013-04-16 Thread David Doud
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23511050

Chinese study - Oligosaccharide from apple induces apoptosis and cell cycle 
arrest in HT29 human colon cancer cells.

If I read the abstract correctly, this was published last month - 

Dunno - it would be nice if someone knowledgable could review this - 

If it were the opposite association, I bet there would be banner headlines...

David Doud
Grower, Indiana 
1/4 green, wet - nice to have a real spring this year - 



___
apple-crop mailing list
apple-crop@virtualorchard.net
http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop


Re: [apple-crop] apple anti-cancer research

2013-04-16 Thread robjwalter
This journal is kind of obscure and I can't get this article from my
university library, but would be interested in seeing it in its entirety.
 If someone could get it to me as a PDF, I'd appreciate it.  Cancer
chemopreventatives, carcinogenesis, and cell culture happen to be among my
specialties.  Based on the abstract, I'll make a few comments.  Of late,
the Chinese have made a great effort in the area of chemopreventatives
probably due to their long cutural history of traditional or herbal
medicine.  Many studies like the one in question have been published over
the past 10-15 years using cultured human tumor cells treated with this or
that naturally occurring agent including curcumin, resveratrol, silibinin,
bitter melon extract, etc.  Many of them show cytotoxic effects on tumor
cells similar to those seen in the apple study.  So, right away, we must
ask, why haven't we stopped cancer using these agents?

Unfortunately, most of these studies suffer from the same failing.  The
apple study showed a dose-dependent killing of cultured human tumor cells
and assayed several apoptosis-related or cell cycle-related peptides or
proteins.  This seems convincing because these assays test for peptides
that are of current interest in apoptosis studies, but here they only
confirm that the cells are dying and point to the stage of cell cycle in
which they are dying, nothing more.  The problem is that cells in culture
can be killed by almost anything and it will occur in a dose-related
manner.  Increasing doses of any salt like NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, CaCl2; any
amino acid like glutamine, alanine, or glycine; any sugar like glucose,
sucrose, or mannose; hormones like insulin, transferrin, or estrogen; even
distilled water will kill cultured cells with increasing doses.  This
doesn't mean that they are specific for tumor cells, just that they will
kill cells in culture and when the cells die, their expression of Bax, Bcl,
Cdk, and cyclins will change in predictable ways.  The control that is
usually missing from these studies is:  *normal human cell lines* like
cultured primary skin cells (keratinocytes) or fibroblasts or normal kidney
cells or normal pancreas or normal gut epithelial cells.  If the agent of
interest kills tumor cells but must be used at 100-10,000 times higher
doses to kill normal cells, then you may have something, but 98% of these
studies don't do this simple but essential control.  A great deal of
confusion results when this control is lacking.

There are several widely used and potent chemotherapy agents that have been
used for decades and are still actively used today.  These agents were
originally derived from plant sources and include colchicine  and colcemid
(from crocus), taxol (from yew), vinblastine and vincristine (from
periwinkle) and podophyllotoxin for etoposide (from mayapple).  So it is
quite reasonable to expect that there will be other phytochemicals that are
yet to be discovered which will be highly effective in preventing tumor
development or in killing tumor cells.  Studies like this one using apple
oligosaccharide however, are not at all convincing no matter what we may
wish for...but I haven't seen the full paper just the abstract.

Rob Walter, PhD
Research Scientist, Retired
Stroger Hospital of Cook County
Rush University Medical School.



On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:53 PM, David Doud david_d...@me.com wrote:

 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23511050

 Chinese study - Oligosaccharide from apple induces apoptosis and cell
 cycle arrest in HT29 human colon cancer cells.

 If I read the abstract correctly, this was published last month -

 Dunno - it would be nice if someone knowledgable could review this -

 If it were the opposite association, I bet there would be banner
 headlines...

 David Doud
 Grower, Indiana
 1/4 green, wet - nice to have a real spring this year -

 *
 *


 ___
 apple-crop mailing list
 apple-crop@virtualorchard.net
 http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop


___
apple-crop mailing list
apple-crop@virtualorchard.net
http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop