Re: [Assam] Kamal Deka's Letter

2005-11-18 Thread Chan Mahanta
Title: Re: [Assam] Kamal Deka's
Letter


He did not
defined what is meant bu the 'system'.

 That is a 'fallacy' ? I learn something everyday.

But Kamal's was indeed a 'FALSE REASONING' ( fallacy), what was
your rationale in declaring:

He is
abosoluetely correct. We must blame the system.


*** Do we know what we are talking about?






At 10:02 PM -0600 11/17/05, Barua25 wrote:
The fallacy in the opinionis
this:
He did not defined what is meant bu the
'system'.
Kesu khandiboloi sesta korile, ason xap.tw wlai
poribo.
I explained this before.
RB


-
Original Message -
From:
Chan Mahanta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
assam@assamnet.org
Sent:
Thursday, November 17, 2005 12:36 PM
Subject:
[Assam] Kamal Deka's Letter

 Fellow
Netters' Kj Deka's Letter to Sentinel of today.

 Makes a good argument, doesn't he ? Man after my own heart
:-).
 cm

**

 System to be Blamed for Corruption?


 Defined simply, corruption is the misuse of public power
for private
 profit. I guess, the human nature all over the world is
essentially
 the same and most human beings will rob their country
blind, given
 half a chance. Therefore, corruption is not the name of the
third
 world disease.

 The Americans do it on a grander scale but do it suavely.
However,
 it is an undeniable fact that the average citizen encounters
more
 petty corruption in Assam than in any State of the USA.
The
 assumption that the problem of corruption is solely tied to
the coat
 tails of moral character is, perhaps, not true. If it is
indeed the
 case that the corruption is the result of character flaws
of the
 Assamese people, then it must be widely seen even when they
are
 removed from their native system of governance. Strangely
enough,
 one does not find that the Assamese in the USA, for
instance, are
 perceived to be especially corrupt. If individuals with
similar
 backgrounds appear to act differently within two different
systems,
 would it not be proper to examine the difference in the two
systems
 of governance, which may provide clues to the understanding
of the
 difference in perceived corruption in Assam and in any of
the fifty
 States of the USA? In my view, it is the system of
governance in
 Assam that needs to be overhauled in order to bring the
degree of
 corruption to the minimum. But then, why would they kill
the goose
 that lays the golden egg of patronage and kickbacks?


 Kamaljit Deka
 Sugarland, Texas

 ___
 assam mailing list
 assam@assamnet.org
 http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org



___
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org


Re: [Assam] Kamal Deka's Letter

2005-11-18 Thread Chan Mahanta
Title: Re: [Assam] Kamal Deka's
Letter


Let us hear
what Chandan says about it.


 I will be pleased to explain. But only to those who are
genuinely interested in understanding or learning.

Don't bring
the issue of sovereignty,

 Why? Does it cause heartburn?







At 9:53 PM -0600 11/17/05, Barua25 wrote:
For sake of Chandan: here is the simple explanation of
my statement in simple English. To help him, I have inserted the
phrases in.
(Let us assume) He is absolutely correct.
(In his assumption) We must blame the system (of
governance). (Thus )USA system (of governance) is
better than Indian system (of governance, since it a reported that
there is more corruption in India than in the USA). In the same
analogy though, within the Indian system we must blame the Assam state
system (of governance)for Assam being more corrupt than
other states (as has been reported widely in the
press).
Now all we need to find out why the Assam system
(of governance) is inferior than other state system (within
India).
Eureka.
Now we need to figure out why the Assam governance
system if more corrupt than other states and who and how to fix
it.

Let us hear what Chandan says about
it.
Is GOI responsible for Assam governance being more
corrupt.
Or he denies that Assam governance is not more
corrupt than other states.
Is it the responsibility of the people of Assam or
GOI to fix the Assam governance?
Which one it is.?

Don't bring the issue of sovereignty, Just answer
the question.
RB.
- Original Message -
From: Rajen
Barua
To: assam@assamnet.org ; Chan Mahanta
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 1:20
PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Kamal Deka's
Letter

He is
abosoluetely correct. We must blame the system. USA system is better
than Indian system. In the same analogy though, within the Indian
system we must bllame the Assam state system for Assam being more
corrupt than other states.
Now all we
need to find out why the Assam system is inferrior than other state
system.
Ureka.
RB.

- Original Message
-
From: Chan Mahanta
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: assam@assamnet.org
Sent: Thursday, November 17,
2005 12:36 PM
Subject: [Assam] Kamal Deka's
Letter

 Fellow Netters' Kj
Deka's Letter to Sentinel of today.

 Makes a good argument, doesn't he ? Man after my own heart
:-).
 cm

**

 System to be Blamed for Corruption?


 Defined simply, corruption is the misuse of public power
for private
 profit. I guess, the human nature all over the world is
essentially
 the same and most human beings will rob their country
blind, given
 half a chance. Therefore, corruption is not the name of the
third
 world disease.

 The Americans do it on a grander scale but do it suavely.
However,
 it is an undeniable fact that the average citizen encounters
more
 petty corruption in Assam than in any State of the USA.
The
 assumption that the problem of corruption is solely tied to
the coat
 tails of moral character is, perhaps, not true. If it is
indeed the
 case that the corruption is the result of character flaws
of the
 Assamese people, then it must be widely seen even when they
are
 removed from their native system of governance. Strangely
enough,
 one does not find that the Assamese in the USA, for
instance, are
 perceived to be especially corrupt. If individuals with
similar
 backgrounds appear to act differently within two different
systems,
 would it not be proper to examine the difference in the two
systems
 of governance, which may provide clues to the understanding
of the
 difference in perceived corruption in Assam and in any of
the fifty
 States of the USA? In my view, it is the system of
governance in
 Assam that needs to be overhauled in order to bring the
degree of
 corruption to the
minimum. But then, why would they kill the goose
 that lays the golden egg of patronage and kickbacks?


 Kamaljit Deka
 Sugarland, Texas

 ___
 assam mailing list
 assam@assamnet.org
 http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org




___
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org



___
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org


Re: [Assam] Kamal Deka's Letter

2005-11-17 Thread Rajen Barua



He is abosoluetely correct. We must 
blame the system. USA system is better than Indian system. In the same analogy 
though, within the Indian system we must bllame the Assam state system for Assam 
being more corrupt than other states.
Now all we need to find out why the 
Assam system is inferrior than other state system.
Ureka.
RB.

- Original Message - 
From: "Chan Mahanta" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: assam@assamnet.org
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 12:36 
PM
Subject: [Assam] Kamal Deka's 
Letter
 Fellow Netters' Kj Deka's Letter to Sentinel of today. 
 Makes a good argument, doesn't he ? Man after my own heart :-). 
cm 
** 
 System to be Blamed for Corruption?   
Defined simply, corruption is the misuse of public power for private 
 profit. I guess, the human nature all over the world is 
essentially  the same and most human beings will rob their country 
blind, given  half a chance. Therefore, corruption is not the name 
of the third  world disease.  The Americans do it 
on a grander scale but do it suavely. However,  it is an undeniable fact 
that the average citizen encounters more  petty corruption in 
Assam than in any State of the USA. The  assumption that the problem 
of corruption is solely tied to the coat  tails of moral character 
is, perhaps, not true. If it is indeed the  case that the 
corruption is the result of character flaws of the  Assamese 
people, then it must be widely seen even when they are  removed 
from their native system of governance. Strangely enough,  one 
does not find that the Assamese in the USA, for instance, are  
perceived to be especially corrupt. If individuals with similar  
backgrounds appear to act differently within two different systems,  
would it not be proper to examine the difference in the two systems 
 of governance, which may provide clues to the understanding of 
the  difference in perceived corruption in Assam and in any of the 
fifty  States of the USA? In my view, it is the system of 
governance in  Assam that needs to be overhauled in order to bring 
the degree of  corruption to the minimum. But then, why would they 
kill the goose  that lays the golden egg of patronage and 
kickbacks?   Kamaljit Deka  Sugarland, 
Texas  ___ 
assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org 
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org 
___
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org


Re: [Assam] Kamal Deka's Letter

2005-11-17 Thread Chan Mahanta
Title: Re: [Assam] Kamal Deka's
Letter


At 1:20 PM -0600 11/17/05, Rajen Barua wrote:
He is abosoluetely correct. We must blame the
system.

*** Would you like to see me post here what your previous
contention was on this matter :-)? Did you not assert, in fact argue
vif gorousy, that NOTHING was the matter wit the system, that it was
the people who are at fault. Did you not argue that the problem was
with the moral fiber of the people?



USA system is better than Indian
system.



 Really? How? Can you please explain ?


In the same analogy though, within the Indian system
we must bllame the Assam state system for Assam being more corrupt
than other states.

 Same analogy? What SAME analogy? And who says Assam is MORE
corrupt than some other state? Is it info. you are privy to? Or are
you parroting another set of Indian statistics, without having a clue
what those statistics are based on, the qualification of the compilers
of those stats, and the quality of the data
used to come up with the conclusions?

And EVEN if it is true that Assam is MORE corrupt than everyone
else, what would YOUR recommendation be in making it LESS corrupt?
How would BLAMING help , if it is expected to, as you imply? If
blaming helps, how come India has been unable to reduce its corruption
even with all the blaming going on for decades?

Finally what is your recommendations on punishment for the people
of Assam, upon whom you have rendered the judgement of being MORE
CORRUPT than the rest of India?

Deny them sovereignty?

 But the commentary makes interesting reading.Political
Science is the richer for these :-).







Now all we need to find out why the Assam system is
inferrior than other state system.
Ureka.
RB.

-
Original Message -
From:
Chan Mahanta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
assam@assamnet.org
Sent:
Thursday, November 17, 2005 12:36 PM
Subject:
[Assam] Kamal Deka's Letter

 Fellow
Netters' Kj Deka's Letter to Sentinel of today.

 Makes a good argument, doesn't he ? Man after my own heart
:-).
 cm

**

 System to be Blamed for Corruption?


 Defined simply, corruption is the misuse of public power
for private
 profit. I guess, the human nature all over the world is
essentially
 the same and most human beings will rob their country
blind, given
 half a chance. Therefore, corruption is not the name of the
third
 world disease.

 The Americans do it on a grander scale but do it suavely.
However,
 it is an undeniable fact that the average citizen encounters
more
 petty corruption in Assam than in any State of the USA.
The
 assumption that the problem of corruption is solely tied to
the coat
 tails of moral character is, perhaps, not true. If it is
indeed the
 case that the corruption is the result of character flaws
of the
 Assamese people, then it must be widely seen even when they
are
 removed from their native system of governance. Strangely
enough,
 one does not find that the Assamese in the USA, for
instance, are
 perceived to be especially corrupt. If individuals with
similar
 backgrounds appear to act differently within two different
systems,
 would it not be proper to examine the difference in the two
systems
 of governance, which may provide clues to the understanding
of the
 difference in perceived corruption in Assam and in any of
the fifty
 States of the USA? In my view, it is the system of
governance in
 Assam that needs to be overhauled in order to bring the
degree of
 corruption to the minimum. But then, why would they kill
the goose
 that lays the golden egg of patronage and kickbacks?


 Kamaljit Deka
 Sugarland, Texas

 ___
 assam mailing list
 assam@assamnet.org
 http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org



___
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org


Re: [Assam] Kamal Deka's Letter

2005-11-17 Thread Barua25
Title: Re: [Assam] Kamal Deka's Letter



Looks like I will have to explain 
it again in plain English. Look at my other message with 
explanation.
RB


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Chan 
  Mahanta 
  To: Rajen Barua ; assam@assamnet.org 
  Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 1:33 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Assam] Kamal Deka's 
  Letter
  
  At 1:20 PM -0600 11/17/05, Rajen Barua wrote:
  He 
is abosoluetely correct. We must blame the system.
  
  *** Would you like to see me post here what your previous contention was 
  on this matter :-)? Did you not assert, in fact argue vif gorousy, that 
  NOTHING was the matter wit the system, that it was the people who are at 
  fault. Did you not argue that the problem was with the moral fiber of the 
  people?
  
  USA system is better than Indian system.
  
   Really? How? Can you please explain ?
  
  
  In 
the same analogy though, within the Indian system we must bllame the Assam 
state system for Assam being more corrupt than other 
  states.
  
   Same analogy? What SAME analogy? And who says Assam is MORE corrupt 
  than some other state? Is it info. you are privy to? Or are you parroting 
  another set of Indian statistics, without having a clue what those statistics 
  are based on, the qualification of the compilers of those stats, and the 
  quality of the data
  used to come up with the conclusions?
  
  And EVEN if it is true that Assam is MORE corrupt than everyone else, 
  what would YOUR recommendation be in making it LESS corrupt? How would 
  BLAMING help , if it is expected to, as you imply? If blaming helps, how come 
  India has been unable to reduce its corruption even with all the blaming going 
  on for decades?
  
  Finally what is your recommendations on punishment for the people of 
  Assam, upon whom you have rendered the judgement of being MORE CORRUPT than 
  the rest of India?
  
  Deny them sovereignty?
  
   But the commentary makes interesting reading.Political Science is 
  the richer for these :-).
  
  
  
  
  
  Now 
all we need to find out why the Assam system is inferrior than other state 
system.
  Ureka.
  RB.
  
  - Original 
Message -
  From: "Chan 
Mahanta" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: assam@assamnet.org
  Sent: Thursday, 
November 17, 2005 12:36 PM
  Subject: [Assam] 
Kamal Deka's Letter
  
   Fellow 
Netters' Kj Deka's Letter to Sentinel of today. Makes a good 
argument, doesn't he ? Man after my own heart :-). cm 
** 
System to be Blamed for Corruption? Defined 
simply, corruption is the misuse of public power for private 
profit. I guess, the human nature all over the world is 
essentially the same and most human beings will rob their 
country blind, given half a chance. Therefore, corruption is 
not the name of the third world disease. The 
Americans do it on a grander scale but do it suavely. However, 
it is an undeniable fact that the average citizen encounters more 
petty corruption in Assam than in any State of the USA. The 
assumption that the problem of corruption is solely tied to the 
coat tails of moral character is, perhaps, not true. If it is 
indeed the case that the corruption is the result of character 
flaws of the Assamese people, then it must be widely seen even 
when they are removed from their native system of governance. 
Strangely enough, one does not find that the Assamese in the 
USA, for instance, are perceived to be especially corrupt. If 
individuals with similar backgrounds appear to act differently 
within two different systems, would it not be proper to examine 
the difference in the two systems of governance, which may 
provide clues to the understanding of the difference in 
perceived corruption in Assam and in any of the fifty States 
of the USA? In my view, it is the system of governance in 
Assam that needs to be overhauled in order to bring the degree 
of corruption to the minimum. But then, why would they kill 
the goose that lays the golden egg of patronage and 
kickbacks? Kamaljit Deka 
Sugarland, Texas 
___ assam mailing 
list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
  
  
___
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org


Re: [Assam] Kamal Deka's Letter

2005-11-17 Thread Barua25



For sake of Chandan: here is the 
simple explanation of my statement in simple English. To help him, I have 
inserted the phrases in.

(Let us assume) He 
is absolutely correct. (In his assumption) We must blame the 
system (of governance). (Thus )USA system 
(of governance) is better than Indian system (of 
governance, since it a reported that there is more corruption in India than in 
the USA). In the same analogy though, within the Indian system we must 
blame the Assam state system (of governance)for Assam 
being more corrupt than other states (as has been reported widely in the 
press).
Now all we need to find out why the 
Assam system (of governance) is inferior than other state 
system (within India).
Eureka.
Now we need to figure out why the 
Assam governance system if more corrupt than other states and who and how to fix 
it.

Let us hear what Chandan 
says about it. 
Is GOI responsible for 
Assam governance being more corrupt.
Or he denies that Assam 
governance is not more corrupt than other states.
Is it the responsibility of 
the people of Assam or GOI to fix the Assam governance?
Which one it 
is.?

Don't bring the issue of 
sovereignty, Just answer the question.
RB.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Rajen Barua 
  
  To: assam@assamnet.org ; Chan Mahanta 
  
  Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 1:20 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Assam] Kamal Deka's 
  Letter
  
  He is abosoluetely correct. We 
  must blame the system. USA system is better than Indian system. In the same 
  analogy though, within the Indian system we must bllame the Assam state system 
  for Assam being more corrupt than other states.
  Now all we need to find out why 
  the Assam system is inferrior than other state system.
  Ureka.
  RB.
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: "Chan Mahanta" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: assam@assamnet.org
  Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 12:36 
  PM
  Subject: [Assam] Kamal Deka's 
  Letter
   Fellow Netters' Kj Deka's Letter to Sentinel of today. 
   Makes a good argument, doesn't he ? Man after my own heart 
  :-). cm 
  ** 
   System to be Blamed for Corruption?   
  Defined simply, corruption is the misuse of public power for private 
   profit. I guess, the human nature all over the world is 
  essentially  the same and most human beings will rob their 
  country blind, given  half a chance. Therefore, corruption is 
  not the name of the third  world disease.  The 
  Americans do it on a grander scale but do it suavely. However,  
  it is an undeniable fact that the average citizen encounters more  
  petty corruption in Assam than in any State of the USA. The  
  assumption that the problem of corruption is solely tied to the coat 
   tails of moral character is, perhaps, not true. If it is indeed 
  the  case that the corruption is the result of character flaws 
  of the  Assamese people, then it must be widely seen even when 
  they are  removed from their native system of governance. 
  Strangely enough,  one does not find that the Assamese in the 
  USA, for instance, are  perceived to be especially corrupt. If 
  individuals with similar  backgrounds appear to act differently within 
  two different systems,  would it not be proper to examine the 
  difference in the two systems  of governance, which may provide 
  clues to the understanding of the  difference in perceived 
  corruption in Assam and in any of the fifty  States of the USA? 
  In my view, it is the system of governance in  Assam that needs 
  to be overhauled in order to bring the degree of  corruption to 
  the minimum. But then, why would they kill the goose  that lays 
  the golden egg of patronage and kickbacks?   
  Kamaljit Deka  Sugarland, Texas  
  ___ assam mailing 
  list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org 
  
  

  ___assam mailing 
  listassam@assamnet.orghttp://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
___
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org


Re: [Assam] Kamal Deka's Letter

2005-11-17 Thread Barua25



The fallacy in the opinionis 
this:
He did not defined what is meant bu 
the 'system'.
Kesu khandiboloi sesta korile, ason 
xap.tw wlai poribo.
I explained this 
before.
RB


- Original Message - 
From: "Chan Mahanta" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: assam@assamnet.org
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 12:36 
PM
Subject: [Assam] Kamal Deka's 
Letter
 Fellow Netters' Kj Deka's Letter to Sentinel of today. 
 Makes a good argument, doesn't he ? Man after my own heart :-). 
cm 
** 
 System to be Blamed for Corruption?   
Defined simply, corruption is the misuse of public power for private 
 profit. I guess, the human nature all over the world is 
essentially  the same and most human beings will rob their country 
blind, given  half a chance. Therefore, corruption is not the name 
of the third  world disease.  The Americans do it 
on a grander scale but do it suavely. However,  it is an undeniable fact 
that the average citizen encounters more  petty corruption in 
Assam than in any State of the USA. The  assumption that the problem 
of corruption is solely tied to the coat  tails of moral character 
is, perhaps, not true. If it is indeed the  case that the 
corruption is the result of character flaws of the  Assamese 
people, then it must be widely seen even when they are  removed 
from their native system of governance. Strangely enough,  one 
does not find that the Assamese in the USA, for instance, are  
perceived to be especially corrupt. If individuals with similar  
backgrounds appear to act differently within two different systems,  
would it not be proper to examine the difference in the two systems 
 of governance, which may provide clues to the understanding of 
the  difference in perceived corruption in Assam and in any of the 
fifty  States of the USA? In my view, it is the system of 
governance in  Assam that needs to be overhauled in order to bring 
the degree of  corruption to the minimum. But then, why would they 
kill the goose  that lays the golden egg of patronage and 
kickbacks?   Kamaljit Deka  Sugarland, 
Texas  ___ 
assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org 
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org 
___
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org